So a 95% confidence interval, say (45, 60), is correctly understood as: repeat the procedure (say) a 100 times (which I suppose means work on a 100 samples), and of the 100 intervals computed thence, 95 will contain the true parameter (95%). This seems to concern itself with the "method" or procedure employed rather any particular interval, which (45, 60) is.
Now on looking again I find this which says something similar, but then adds,
Recall from the introductory section in the chapter on probability that, for some purposes, probability is best thought of as subjective. It is reasonable, although not required by the laws of probability, that one adopt a subjective probability of 0.95 that a 95% confidence interval, as typically computed, contains the parameter in question.
Sorry, bit confused here. When we compute a 95% confidence interval, we actually have to find the critical z score for 97.5% because the 2 tails constitute the 5% and one tail (2.5% has to be included and the other not). Correct? That's why the critical z value is 1.96 and not 2. Si?
Agent Smith, I don't understand why are you confused! Z score points just tell us how far away we are from the mean which allow us to calculate the probability or the area under the curve. For example, the Z-score of 1.96 allow us to calculate the Z0.975 (which has many different names) which just means that the area under the curve is 0.975or97.5% of the whole area.
In other words, P(X<1.96)=0.975.
If you want to be more precise:
P(x<1.96)=2π1∫−∞1.96e−2x2≈0.975
If you are confused between the Z-score of 1.96 and the Z-score of 2 which one of them gives Z0.975, just calculate it by the integral or look at it in the Z-score table.
P(x<2)=2π1∫−∞2e−2x2dx≈0.977
Obviously, it is slightly greater than the 97.5th percentile point which is 1.96.
When they tell you that 95% of the area lies within 1.96 standard deviation of the mean, they just mean the area under the curve is 0.95 between −1.96 and 1.96.
Or
P(−1.96<X<1.96)=2π1∫−1.961.96e−2x2dx≈0.95
This result that I have just shown was the area for a 95% confidence interval.
One last thing to mention is that:
If P(X<1.96)=0.975, it means P(X>1.96)=P(X<−1.96)=0.025 which is the area under each of the left and right tails.
Agent Smith, I don't understand why are you confused! Z score points just tell us how far away we are from the mean which allow us to calculate the probability or the area under the curve. For example, the Z-score of 1.96 allow us to calculate the Z0.975 (which has many different names) which just means that the area under the curve is 0.975or97.5% of the whole area.
In other words, P(X<1.96)=0.975.
If you want to be more precise:
P(x<1.96)=2π1∫−∞1.96e−2x2≈0.975
If you are confused between the Z-score of 1.96 and the Z-score of 2 which one of them gives Z0.975, just calculate it by the integral or look at it in the Z-score table.
P(x<2)=2π1∫−∞2e−2x2dx≈0.977
Obviously, it is slightly greater than the 97.5th percentile point which is 1.96.
When they tell you that 95% of the area lies within 1.96 standard deviation of the mean, they just mean the area under the curve is 0.95 between −1.96 and 1.96.
Or
P(−1.96<X<1.96)=2π1∫−1.961.96e−2x2dx≈0.95
This result that I have just shown was the area for a 95% confidence interval.
One last thing to mention is that:
If P(X<1.96)=0.975, it means P(X>1.96)=P(X<−1.96)=0.025 which is the area under each of the left and right tails.
The thing is by the empirical (68 - 95 - 99.7) rule, 95% of the area corresponds to a z score of 2, no? The z score of 1.96 corresponds to 95%. Isn't that confusing?
Can you clarify? Is this some kind of approximation?
The thing is by the empirical (68 - 95 - 99.7) rule, 95% of the area corresponds to a z score of 2, no? The z score of 1.96 corresponds to 95%. Isn't that confusing?
Can you clarify? Is this some kind of approximation?
Yes, it is just a fancy approximation. If you want to be so precise, even 1.96 is wrong. What about 1.95996398? Do you want more digits or do you want to be fancy and just say 2?
The thing is by the empirical (68 - 95 - 99.7) rule, 95% of the area corresponds to a z score of 2, no? The z score of 1.96 corresponds to 95%. Isn't that confusing?
Can you clarify? Is this some kind of approximation?
A full explanation of the empirical rule (as opposed to an introduction for students who may know nothing about the normal distribution yet) will say what is said here:
In statistics, the 68–95–99.7 rule, also known as the empirical rule, and sometimes abbreviated 3sr, is a shorthand used to remember the percentage of values that lie within an interval estimate in a normal distribution: approximately 68%, 95%, and 99.7% of the values lie within one, two, and three standard deviations of the mean, respectively.
...
It is just a memorable approximation, and should not be used if precision matters. If the probability you want is 95%, then z will not be exactly 2.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.