Good morning/evening everyone. I have a doctrinal question here and I am not quite sure if the question is wrong or the answer I deduct from my own question is wrong.
I am at the trigonometric identities chapter, specifically secx = 1/cosx. Another identity is tanx = sinx/cosx.
Other rules/identities:
tanx=opposite/adjacent; sinx=opposite/hypotenuse;
cosx=adjacent/hypotenuse.
Further on, the book goes on to say "this relationship between trigonometric ratios is called an identity because it is true for all values of x in a given domain".
Then here is a problem:
Show that tanxsinx + cosx = secx.
First trial was (opposite/adjacent)x(opposite/hypotenuse)+(adjacent/hypotenuse)=1/adjacenthypotenuse
That is not precisely hypotenuse/adjacent as i expect secx to be.
On a second trial, where i use (sinx/cosx)sinx + cosx= (sinsquaredx + cossquaredx)/cosx that brings me to the expected result of course.
My question is, am I missing a step where 1/adjacenthypotenuse becomes hypotenuse/adjacent or is any of the trigonometric identities not much of an identity?
Thank you in advance.
I am at the trigonometric identities chapter, specifically secx = 1/cosx. Another identity is tanx = sinx/cosx.
Other rules/identities:
tanx=opposite/adjacent; sinx=opposite/hypotenuse;
cosx=adjacent/hypotenuse.
Further on, the book goes on to say "this relationship between trigonometric ratios is called an identity because it is true for all values of x in a given domain".
Then here is a problem:
Show that tanxsinx + cosx = secx.
First trial was (opposite/adjacent)x(opposite/hypotenuse)+(adjacent/hypotenuse)=1/adjacenthypotenuse
That is not precisely hypotenuse/adjacent as i expect secx to be.
On a second trial, where i use (sinx/cosx)sinx + cosx= (sinsquaredx + cossquaredx)/cosx that brings me to the expected result of course.
My question is, am I missing a step where 1/adjacenthypotenuse becomes hypotenuse/adjacent or is any of the trigonometric identities not much of an identity?
Thank you in advance.