surjective map

logistic_guy

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2024
Messages
1,504
Let f : AB\displaystyle f \ : \ A \rightarrow B be a surjective map of sets. Prove that the relation ab\displaystyle a \sim b if and only if f(a)=f(b)\displaystyle f(a) = f(b) is an equivalence relation whose equivalence classes are the fibers of f\displaystyle f.
 
Let f : AB\displaystyle f \ : \ A \rightarrow B be a surjective map of sets. Prove that the relation ab\displaystyle a \sim b if and only if f(a)=f(b)\displaystyle f(a) = f(b) is an equivalence relation whose equivalence classes are the fibers of f\displaystyle f.
Please show us what you have tried and exactly where you are stuck.

Please follow the rules of posting in this forum, as enunciated at:


Please share your work/thoughts about this problem
 
To prove that the relation is an equivalence relation, I must prove or show that:

\displaystyle \sim is reflexive.

And

\displaystyle \sim is symmetric.

And

\displaystyle \sim is transitive.
 
If the preimage of the element aA\displaystyle a \in A under the map f\displaystyle f is:

f1(a)={xA  x=a}\displaystyle f^{-1}(a) = \{x \in A \ | \ x = a\}

Then,

The preimage of the element bB\displaystyle b \in B under the map f\displaystyle f is:

f1(b)={xA  f(x)=b}\displaystyle f^{-1}(b) = \{x \in A \ | \ f(x) = b\}
 
Let f : AB\displaystyle f \ : \ A \rightarrow B be a surjective map of sets. Prove that the relation ab\displaystyle a \sim b if and only if f(a)=f(b)\displaystyle f(a) = f(b) is an equivalence relation whose equivalence classes are the fibers of f\displaystyle f.
If P&Q P \& Q are sets and f:PQ f:P \to Q surjectionly then f(t)\overleftarrow{f}(t) is the set {xP:f(x)=t}\{x\in P: f(x)=t\}
Because f f is a surjection, we know f(t)\overleftarrow{f}(t)\not=\emptyset for all tQt\in Q WHY IS THAT TRUE?
You seem to under that aP& bP \forall {a\in P \&\ b\in P} then (ab)    (f(a)=f(b))(a\sim b)\iff(f(a)=f(b))
Do you have any issues with the relation \sim being an equivalence relation?
Do you see that (tQ)(\forall t\in Q) the collection of sets f(t)\overleftarrow{f}(t) forms a partition of set PP?
Now as fibers I have a huge collection of textbooks in set theory &/or function theory none of which use that term.
But I do suspect that the sets f(t)\overleftarrow{f}(t) are what they mean.
 
If P&Q P \& Q are sets and f:PQ f:P \to Q surjectionly then f(t)\overleftarrow{f}(t) is the set {xP:f(x)=t}\{x\in P: f(x)=t\}
Because f f is a surjection, we know f(t)\overleftarrow{f}(t)\not=\emptyset for all tQt\in Q WHY IS THAT TRUE?
You seem to under that aP& bP \forall {a\in P \&\ b\in P} then (ab)    (f(a)=f(b))(a\sim b)\iff(f(a)=f(b))
Do you have any issues with the relation \sim being an equivalence relation?
Do you see that (tQ)(\forall t\in Q) the collection of sets f(t)\overleftarrow{f}(t) forms a partition of set PP?
Now as fibers I have a huge collection of textbooks in set theory &/or function theory none of which use that term.
But I do suspect that the sets f(t)\overleftarrow{f}(t) are what they mean.
Yeah the term fiber (fibers) looks weirdo, but it is widely used in Russia and the Soviet Union in general.

For example, the fiber of f\displaystyle f over f(a)\displaystyle f(a) is just f1(f(a))\displaystyle f^{-1}(f(a)). Other notations can be used and yours (f(f(a)))\left(\overleftarrow{f}(f(a))\right) may be one of them.

In other words, it is the same as saying f1(f(a))\displaystyle f^{-1}(f(a)) is the preimage of the element f(a)\displaystyle f(a) under the function f\displaystyle f. Of course it consists of all the points in the domain A\displaystyle A that are mapped to the same value f(a)\displaystyle f(a) in the codomain B\displaystyle B.

Thanks a lot professor pka for passing by. What you have given is very valuable and I'll study it deeply.
Be in touch with this thread if you wanna see how I'll crack the h-ell of this elementary problem.

💪🗿
 
Let us check the first property which is reflexivity.

To show \displaystyle \sim is reflexive means we need to show aa\displaystyle a \sim a. We know that f(a)=f(a)\displaystyle f(a) = f(a), then it is absolutely true that aa\displaystyle a \sim a and \displaystyle \sim is reflexive.
 
Let us check the second property which is symmetry.

To show \displaystyle \sim is symmetric means we need to show if ab\displaystyle a \sim b, then ba\displaystyle b \sim a. We know that f(a)=f(b)\displaystyle f(a) = f(b), then f(b)=f(a)\displaystyle f(b) = f(a). This means that ba\displaystyle b \sim a and \displaystyle \sim is symmetric.
 
Let us check the third property which is transitivity.

To show \displaystyle \sim is transitive means we need to show if ab\displaystyle a \sim b and bc\displaystyle b \sim c, then ac\displaystyle a \sim c. We know that f(a)=f(b)\displaystyle f(a) = f(b) and f(b)=f(c)\displaystyle f(b) = f(c), then f(a)=f(c)\displaystyle f(a) = f(c) and \displaystyle \sim is transitive.
 
Now an equivalent class of that relation is just the set f1(a)={xA  x=a}\displaystyle f^{-1}(a) = \{x \in A \ | \ x = a\} and the fiber of f\displaystyle f of any element bB\displaystyle b \in B is just the set f1(b)={xA  f(x)=b}\displaystyle f^{-1}(b) = \{x \in A \ | \ f(x) = b\}.

Since the the function f\displaystyle f is surjective, then every element in B\displaystyle B has the form f(a)\displaystyle f(a) for any aA\displaystyle a \in A.

Then,

The fibers of the function f\displaystyle f are the equivalence classes of that relation.
 
Top