logistic_guy
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2024
- Messages
- 1,504
Let f : A→B be a surjective map of sets. Prove that the relation a∼b if and only if f(a)=f(b) is an equivalence relation whose equivalence classes are the fibers of f.
Please show us what you have tried and exactly where you are stuck.Let f : A→B be a surjective map of sets. Prove that the relation a∼b if and only if f(a)=f(b) is an equivalence relation whose equivalence classes are the fibers of f.
If P&Q are sets and f:P→Q surjectionly then f(t) is the set {x∈P:f(x)=t}Let f : A→B be a surjective map of sets. Prove that the relation a∼b if and only if f(a)=f(b) is an equivalence relation whose equivalence classes are the fibers of f.
Yeah the term fiber (fibers) looks weirdo, but it is widely used in Russia and the Soviet Union in general.If P&Q are sets and f:P→Q surjectionly then f(t) is the set {x∈P:f(x)=t}
Because f is a surjection, we know f(t)=∅ for all t∈Q WHY IS THAT TRUE?
You seem to under that ∀a∈P& b∈P then (a∼b)⟺(f(a)=f(b))
Do you have any issues with the relation ∼ being an equivalence relation?
Do you see that (∀t∈Q) the collection of sets f(t) forms a partition of set P?
Now as fibers I have a huge collection of textbooks in set theory &/or function theory none of which use that term.
But I do suspect that the sets f(t) are what they mean.