its among the most mysterious exercises i encountered
It's a nice type of exercise (with 1/4 instead of 5), but I sure went off the rails in this thread. I normally check my paper-and-pencil work using software, but I'd skipped that step because my distribution error made my answer 4 -- which seemed like a nice, clean result.
I'm curious, if you don't mind answering: At what point during the three days did you begin to suspect that 5 was wrong? Or, did you happen to try something additional after posting here and then suddenly recognize from new work, "Gee, if only that 5 were 1/4"?
I've re-read the entire thread, and, in hindsight, I can see a couple reasons why I became confused. I had not seen some of your posts. The forum software is no longer consistently notifying me in the mobile version when new posts are added. (I need to remember to review long threads, in those situations.) Also, I think we were working on different questions at some point because you knew something was wrong with 5 and I didn't. You'd mentioned it before, but somehow you'd missed answering a couple followup questions.
I would also like to say that your conversational English is fine and that I may have misjudged your technical language too harshly; I was missing context.
When I'd discovered afterwards that all the a,b,c solutions must have at least one imaginary number, I'm glad that I didn't try to solve the system by hand! (Using a solution for a,b,c would have been another way to double-check my original answer of 4.) Cheers
?