Kailahernandez15
New member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2019
- Messages
- 2
Let m and n be non-negative integers. Prove that if mn>100, then m<10 and n<10 by contradiction
Please share your work/thoughts about this assignment.Let m and n be non-negative integers. Prove that if mn>100, then m<10 and n<10 by contradiction
I think you copied something wrong. It's easy to find m and n, both greater than 10, such that mn > 100. (I'm using contradiction to show that the claim is false!)Let m and n be non-negative integers. Prove that if mn>100, then m<10 and n<10 by contradiction
You cannot prove what is falseLet m and n be non-negative integers. Prove that if mn>100, then m<10 and n<10 by contradiction
It is the exact problem given by my professor. We should prove it using contradiction.I think you copied something wrong. It's easy to find m and n, both greater than 10, such that mn > 100. (I'm using contradiction to show that the claim is false!)
Are you positive that you (or your professor) didn't copy a symbol wrong? Something more like this could make sense:It is the exact problem given by my professor. We should prove it using contradiction.
"Let m and n be non-negative integers. Prove that if mn>100, then m<10 and n<10"
I'm really having a hard time![]()
We know that 10*10=100. If we decrease both numbers then the product will always be less than 100.Let m and n be non-negative integers. Prove that if mn>100, then m<10 and n<10 by contradiction
Not as the problem was stated; the conditional statement doesn't apply to m=9 and n=8, since then it is not true that mn > 100.We know that 10*10=100. If we decrease both numbers then the product will always be less than 100.
Just let m=9 and n=8. If the statement you made is correct then 9*8 >100 !
Yes, you are correct. Is Otis still in the corner?Not as the problem was stated; the conditional statement doesn't apply to m=9 and n=8, since then it is not true that mn > 100.
My counterexample would be something like m=10 and n=11. Then mn > 100, so the claim is that m<10 and n<10. That, of course, is not true.