Dr.Peterson
Elite Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017
- Messages
- 16,749
Let's be very direct. The equations
are not equivalent; they represent parallel lines, because when you multiply the second equation by 2, you get
When you subtract the first from the second, you get 0 = 17, which tells you there is no solution. Or if you solve each equation for y, you get
which are parallel lines, having the same slope but different y-intercepts.
So having the right-hand sides be equal did not make the equations equivalent so there would be infinitely many solutions.
But look at these equations:
Here we can tell that they represent the same line because if we multiply the second by 2 (so that the LHS becomes the same), the RHS's also become the same. That is, the ratio of the RHS is the same as the ratio of the LHS.
Now go back to your problem:
What must be true of a and b to make these equations represent the same line, so that the system is inconsistent?
2x+6y=17
x+3y=17
are not equivalent; they represent parallel lines, because when you multiply the second equation by 2, you get
2x+6y=17
2x+6y=34
When you subtract the first from the second, you get 0 = 17, which tells you there is no solution. Or if you solve each equation for y, you get
y = -1/3 x + 17/6
y = -1/3 x + 34/6
which are parallel lines, having the same slope but different y-intercepts.
So having the right-hand sides be equal did not make the equations equivalent so there would be infinitely many solutions.
But look at these equations:
2x+6y=34
x+3y=17
Here we can tell that they represent the same line because if we multiply the second by 2 (so that the LHS becomes the same), the RHS's also become the same. That is, the ratio of the RHS is the same as the ratio of the LHS.
Now go back to your problem:
2x - 3y = a
4x - 6y = b
What must be true of a and b to make these equations represent the same line, so that the system is inconsistent?