You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
logistic_guy
- Thread starter Steven G
- Start date
I am wondering when some admin will ban logistic_guy for no following the forum's rules?
I sent messages to a moderator and the administrator. If he/they will not bother
to do anything towards a ban, then I hope this site dries up like a ghost town.
Smart/wise people are not to waste their time/efforts/talents in places where
the leadership does not care.
I cannot understand why you all call for censorship instead of using the "ignore" functionality.
The deliberate banning of people was what led me here from another platform. Seems it's really difficult these days to find liberal minds that do not call for tyrants whenever someone does not fit their expectations. Sad.
The deliberate banning of people was what led me here from another platform. Seems it's really difficult these days to find liberal minds that do not call for tyrants whenever someone does not fit their expectations. Sad.
I cannot understand why you all call for censorship instead of using the "ignore" functionality.
The deliberate banning of people was what led me here from another platform.
Banning users, either in temporary time blocks or on a permanent basis is discipline for people who repeatedly
abuse forum rules and/or ignoring multiple warnings and/or make one or more egregious violations.
The goal is not to find liberal minds. You have the wrong attitude calling anyone a "tyrant" who is helping to clear
up the boards. What is "sad" is that you are an apologist/excuse-maker for troublemakers on the forums. The
"ignore" feature does not get rid of users who do not belong after they should have been banned, temporarily or
permanently.
I had an instance several years ago on here. I noticed that a veteran user on here (who even with a high message count)
was making sexual overtures to alleged female students. That tipped me off that he had a big ego. I corrected him on
a problem. He flew into a rage and made a very vulgar comment to me publicly in a post. I sent a copy of that comment
to Ted, the administrator, and Ted had him permanently banned immediately. It's important to the forum community to
take charge, assert toward warnings and/or bans. In my case, the "ignore" action was not/is not appropriate.
Last edited:
The goal is not to find liberal minds. You have the wrong attitude calling anyone a "tyrant" who is helping to clear
up the boards.
Banning people who you do not like is an act of arbitrariness. Yes, if that is the only visible reason, then I use this word. Maybe you should reconsider your attitude. Cleansing is a two-sided sword and a term I do not like, primarily for historical reasons.
What is "sad" is that you are an apologist/excuse-maker for troublemakers on the forums.
It is sad that you are apparently not capable of reasoning without using insults. Offending me is your only argument. So who is the troublemaker here? Define troublemaker, please! You are obviously fighting a private war against certain users like me. Again, please reconsider your verbiage. Maybe you can find a way, or ask someone who can, to phrase your positions without ad hominem offenses. I would very much appreciate not being insulted by you whenever I take a stand you do not like. As long as you can't, I will call such a behavior unacceptable, to avoid another adjective that I really have in mind.
And you are the one who decides who belongs here and who does not? Interesting point of view! I haven't been informed about this crucial fact when I signed up. Someone should definitely rewrite the publically available terms.The
"ignore" feature does not get rid of users who do not belong after they should have been banned, temporarily or
permanently.
As much as I would like to continue at this ad hominem level, let's have a look at the facts. What makes you think that @logistic_guy does not belong here? As far as I can see, there are mainly two arguments. However, I had to guess a bit since you preferred to offend me rather than argue by testable arguments.
1. He posts questions without showing any effort to answer them.
Well, he changed that behavior and recently tried to fill this gap.
2. He posts too many questions.
Is there an upper bound I haven't been informed about? Is curiosity against the rules?
As far as I can see, he does not offend anybody, does not use vulgar language, slang, or internet acronyms, is unpolitical, unreligious, doesn't post questionable theories or advertisements. What are those ominous rules that he presumably breaches? What else do you complain about? Except for your war against members like me who aren't fluent in English. And here is this adjective again I do not dare to speak out loud but definitely associate with your attitude. And I know from the history of my country that it would be appropriate to use.
Incorrect.....Well, he changed that behavior and recently tried to fill this gap.
Watch his latest 10 posts in WHATS NEW.
No work shown for any of those problems
That's new. My judgment came to his last "list" where he at least answered a couple of them.Incorrect.....
Watch his latest 10 posts in WHATS NEW.
Wouldn't then the removal of such posts be the better educational method?No work shown for any of those problems
Wouldn't then the removal of such posts be the better educational method?
No, you are being spineless. You brought your own liberal mentality from somewhere else where there could actually be a functioning message board over to here to appease a constant rules violator who needs to be banned. You have been corrected in multiple ways as to this logistic_guy. There is not an "educational method" to dealing with constant rules violators who do not care. Your posts and replies about being "offended" are jokes. Let's try you on "ignore."
No, you are being spineless. You brought your own liberal mentality from somewhere else where there could actually be a functioning message board over to here to appease a constant rules violator who needs to be banned. You have been corrected in multiple ways as to this logistic_guy. There is not an "educational method" to dealing with constant rules violators who do not care. Your posts and replies about being "offended" are jokes. Let's try you on "ignore."
Is there any chance you would stop insulting me? It's becoming boring. I think it is you who should be banned, simply for breaching the rule of a respectful debate and repeatedly offending me. Now you even started crying insults!
Says a fascist.Your posts and replies about being "offended" are jokes.
Please stop this bickering......Says a fascist.