Where did you get x+1 in the denominator from? You correctly split the quotient x(x2+1)1=x1−x2+1xThis can be solved by logarithms, the first one is directly a logarithm, and the second one needs a substitution u=x2+1.
Did you switch to your original problem at this stage without mention?
The original problem has a nasty anti-derivative with logs and arcus tangent.
∫x2−x+1x−2dx=21(log(x2−x+1)−23tan−1((2x−1)3))+constant
You could probably do it by looking up the anti-derivatives of x2−x+11 and x2−x+1x eventually after another substitution. However, it is a definite integral. It is easier to solve by the residue method than by partial fraction decomposition. Did you read the article I linked? It contains an example of how it is done, although it only mentions that ∫(x3+1)−1dx can be solved accordingly.
Allow me a remark: stop using ∞ as if it were a number, it is not! ∫0∞x+11dx does not converge! This is another problem with the partial fraction decomposition: it leaves you with two divergent integrals! Since ∫0∞(x3+1)−1dx is finite, the two "divergencies" cancel each other what cannot be seen by the partial fractions.
Where did you get x+1 in the denominator from? You correctly split the quotient x(x2+1)1=x1−x2+1xThis can be solved by logarithms, the first one is directly a logarithm, and the second one needs a substitution u=x2+1.
Did you switch to your original problem at this stage without mention?
The original problem has a nasty anti-derivative with logs and arcus tangent.
∫x2−x+1x−2dx=21(log(x2−x+1)−23tan−1((2x−1)3))+constant
You could probably do it by looking up the anti-derivatives of x2−x+11 and x2−x+1x eventually after another substitution. However, it is a definite integral. It is easier to solve by the residue method than by partial fraction decomposition. Did you read the article I linked? It contains an example of how it is done, although it only mentions that ∫(x3+1)−1dx can be solved accordingly.
Allow me a remark: stop using ∞ as if it were a number, it is not! ∫0∞x+11dx does not converge! This is another problem with the partial fraction decomposition: it leaves you with two divergent integrals! Since ∫0∞(x3+1)−1dx is finite, the two "divergencies" cancel each other what cannot be seen by the partial fractions.
You can't. Partial fraction decomposition gives you a problem you can't solve:
332π=∫0∞x3+11dx=31divergent∫0∞x+11dx+32=334π∫0∞x2−x+11dx−31divergent∫0∞x2−x+1xdxHow will you deal with the divergent integrals? You cannot subtract one divergency from another and get zero. And even if, it won't produce the correct result. All you can do is solve the integral in the middle which gives you an arcus tangent, but this isn't the result of the entire integral.
Here are a couple of useful links where you can look up integrals:
It's German and there is unfortunately no English version, but it is so full of formulas that you won't need a translation, and the technical terms are more or less identical. The only word you possibly need is "Beweis" which means "Proof".
It's German and there is unfortunately no English version, but it is so full of formulas that you won't need a translation, and the technical terms are more or less identical. The only word you possibly need is "Beweis" which means "Proof".
I am sure that you would have figured out all these tricks and manipulations if you took the integral seriously. But it seems that you and I are interested more in the complex analysis part because it is very rare to see a student discusses contours.
Believe it or not, a few weeks ago Mr. logistic_guy told us that he is an Artist. Therefore, I think that your teacher meant that integrals can only be solved by an Artist, but not all Artists can solve integrals.
The most fascinating thing here is that an Artist who studies engineering. A very rare thing to happen.
You are right about the triangle, but we can also get the inverse tangent from other places. In the first day of integral calculus class, you should have been given the solution of some elementary integrals such as ∫u2+11du=tan−1u+c.
(Don't worry about the c, it is just some constant.)
If don't remember, you can follow this concept:
If the derivative of x is →1, then the integral of 1 is →x+c.
This means:
If the derivative of tan−1x is →x2+11, then the integral of x2+11 is →tan−1x+c.
Have you ever differentiated the inverse tangent function? Let me guess. No.
Then, it is time for differentiation
Let y=tan−1x
tany=x
dxd(tany=x)
sec2ydxdy=1
dxdy=sec2y1
And we know from trigonometry class, tan2y+1=sec2y
Then,
dxdy=sec2y1=tan2y+11=x2+11 (And the proof is completed.)
Limit involving infinity needs a lot of practice. But here we just have a fraction of polynomials. If the leading terms have the same power, the limit is just the coefficient of the leading terms division. This just means R2R2=11=1.
Here we have tan−1∞ and we want to know what happens to the inverse tangent function as x goes to ∞. One way to see that y goes to 2π by graphing the function.
Another way is to write tan−1∞ as:
tany=cosysiny=∞
What is the first angle that will make the denominator =0. Well, it is obvious 90degrees.
Then, tan2π=cos2πsin2π=01=∞.
This means 2π=tan−1∞.
Some people (such as fresh_42) will hate you if you write infinity ∞ as if it is a number. Therefore, it is a good practice to always use a limit:
I have just added a quarter and subtracted a quarter.
x2−x+1=x2−x+1+41−41 (I did not change anything.)
And from algebra class you should know: x2−x+41=(x−21)(x−21)=(x−21)2.
Then, x2−x+1=x2−x+1+41−41=(x−21)2+1−41
You are right about the triangle, but we can also get the inverse tangent from other places. In the first day of integral calculus class, you should have been given the solution of some elementary integrals such as ∫u2+11du=tan−1u+c.
(Don't worry about the c, it is just some constant.)
If don't remember, you can follow this concept:
If the derivative of x is →1, then the integral of 1 is →x+c.
This means:
If the derivative of tan−1x is →x2+11, then the integral of x2+11 is →tan−1x+c.
Have you ever differentiated the inverse tangent function? Let me guess. No.
Then, it is time for differentiation
Let y=tan−1x
tany=x
dxd(tany=x)
sec2ydxdy=1
dxdy=sec2y1
And we know from trigonometry class, tan2y+1=sec2y
Then,
dxdy=sec2y1=tan2y+11=x2+11 (And the proof is completed.)
Limit involving infinity needs a lot of practice. But here we just have a fraction of polynomials. If the leading terms have the same power, the limit is just the coefficient of the leading terms division. This just means R2R2=11=1.
Here we have tan−1∞ and we want to know what happens to the inverse tangent function as x goes to ∞. One way to see that y goes to 2π by graphing the function.
Another way is to write tan−1∞ as:
tany=cosysiny=∞
What is the first angle that will make the denominator =0. Well, it is obvious 90degrees.
Then, tan2π=cos2πsin2π=01=∞.
This means 2π=tan−1∞.
Some people (such as fresh_42) will hate you if you write infinity ∞ as if it is a number. Therefore, it is a good practice to always use a limit:
x→∞limtan−1x=2π
You mean tan−13−1=−6π.
This last one will depend on how quickly you can calculate some angles without calculator such as, 0∘,30∘,45∘,60∘,and90∘.
My point was if you write the fraction as 61 when it is meant to be 65, you are missing some terms in the numerator. These terms are not difficult to find when you are calculating simple fractions as 21+31. But when the fractions are polynomials, you will need to do some work to find the missing terms as was explained to you in post #18 by fresh_42.
As professor Dave has told you, it is good to know how to solve by partial fraction, but in this problem you have to put this method aside as you were told not to use it. If I were you, I would directly solve the problem by complex analysis.
Thank you for uploading this picture. It helps a lot to understand what to calculate. In the contour, you have three paths, so you will need to solve three integrals:
∫C1f(z)dz+∫C2f(z)dz+∫C3f(z)dz=2πiB
If you have solved contours before, you would already know that the curve path would get cancelled as it would be equal to zero. Therefore, two paths would remain:
∫C1f(z)dz+∫C3f(z)dz=2πiB
Your first task is to find B which is the residues at the zeros that are located inside the contour. To find B, you need first to find the zeros which is the easiest part in the problem.
x3+1=0 (Since this is a cubic function, you should get three zeros. Some are imaginary.)
I remember that there is a post written by fresh_42 where he showed the method of finding all the roots (real and complex) of a function. You can use it as a quick guidance. If you got stuck in finding the complex roots, use W|A.
Note: It is not difficult to show that the integral of the curve path will be zero as R→∞.
Integration is a complicated subject. There are many tips and tricks but there is no golden way to solve them all.
Here is an overview of the residue method:
I want to shed some light on complex analysis without getting all the technical details in the way which are necessary for the precise treatments that can be found in many excellent standard textbooks.
Yes, sorry, @logistic_guy . It is a bit hard to tell which level of answers should be given. I don't know much about the members. Some ask very basic questions, others quite sophisticated ones, and yours swam somewhere between them. Complex integration of real functions is not trivial. And real integration of real functions can be tricky as @mario99 has shown us.
I'm still baffled by how he got rid of the divergence problem of the two critical terms before integration. It meant that he used partial fractions but took a step back and recombined two critical quotients again to avoid infinite values. I very much like that example because it shows that "one method serves all" usually doesn't work for integrations.
I don't want to bother you with another article, but I quote it anyway in case a) some readers might be interested, b) you're brave and give me another shot (I first thought your question was primarily about complex integration), c) someone wants to link it because it lists many of the standard tricks in real integration. And if nothing of it counts: it has examples! www.physicsforums.com/insights/the-art-of-integration/
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.