Graph the FFG. circle: 4x^2 + 6x + y^2 = 7, y^2 + x^2 + 4x - 4y - 1 = 0, etc.

SagaSaturn

New member
Joined
Sep 18, 2023
Messages
1
I haven't been to school in years. I don't even know the first steps to take. I just want to know the process for one of these.379453400_826761192274465_2611364154105715791_n.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This looks like algebra rather than calculus, so I'm probably misunderstanding things. What is the meaning of "FFG." in the instructions? What are you supposed to be doing with these circle equations?

When you reply, please include a clear listing of your thoughts and efforts so far, so we can see where you're getting stuck. Thank you!
 
I haven't been to school in years. I don't even know the first steps to take. I just want to know the process for one of these.View attachment 36421
A circle of radius R, with a center (h, k), has the equation
(xh)2+(yk)2=R2(x-h)^2 + (y-k)^2 = R^2

What you need to do is get each of these equations into this format.

So, if you have
x2+2x+y2=3x^2 + 2x + y^2 = 3

you need to "complete the square" on x2+2xx^2 + 2x. Do you recall how to do that?

-Dan
 
I haven't been to school in years. I don't even know the first steps to take. I just want to know the process for one of these.View attachment 36421
I suspect that in your dialect, "ffg." is an abbreviation for "following". (It is not in mine.)

As to solving these problems. we typically rewrite the equation (given in what may be called "general form", x^2+y^2+ax+by+c=0) to what may be called "standard form", as shown. (The first, unfortunately, is not a circle because the coefficients of x^2 and y^2 are different; is that a typo?)

Here is one source:

 
I haven't been to school in years. I don't even know the first steps to take. I just want to know the process for one of these.View attachment 36421
The general equation of a circle is (also) given in the form:-

x2+y2+2gx+2fy+c=0\displaystyle x^2+y^2+2gx+2fy+c=0   (See here.)

Where: (g,f)\displaystyle (-g, -f) is the centre of the circle

and
g2+f2c\displaystyle \sqrt{g^2+f^2-c}  is its radius.

Have you not been taught this?
The exercise you've been given looks (to me) as if it is based on this 'knowledge'.

I say that because all of the equations you've been given are already in this form
(or very close to it; in 3) & 5) minimal rearrangement is required).


Except, of course, for 1) which is not the equation of a circle!
(I suppose all you can do there is state that.)

So you don't have to get each of the equations into the form:
(xh)2+(yk)2=R2\displaystyle (x-h)^2 + (y-k)^2 = R^2

Once you have slightly re-arranged 3) & 5) you can (almost) directly "read off " the radius of each circle and the coordinates of its centre which subsequently makes graphing the circles fairly straightforward.

For example:-

Equation 2) is:
x2+y2+4x4y1=0\displaystyle x^{2}+y^{2}+4x-4y-1=0

So  2g=4,2f=4\displaystyle 2g=4, 2f=-4 and c=1    g=2\displaystyle c=-1\\ \implies g=2 and f=2\displaystyle f=-2.

Therefore, this circle has its centre at (-2, 2) and has radius:
22+ˉ22ˉ1=4+4+1=9=3\displaystyle \sqrt{2^2+ˉ2^2-ˉ1}=\sqrt{4+4+1}=\sqrt{9}=3 which is then simple enough to graph (as illustrated
here).

Now you have been shown the "process" for one, please come back and show us your efforts for the remaining questions: 3) to 5).


Hope that helps. ?
 
Last edited:
. . .
So  2g=4,2f=4\displaystyle 2g=4, 2f=-4 and c=1    g=2\displaystyle c=-1\\ \implies g=2 and f=2\displaystyle f=-2.

Therefore, this circle has its centre at (-2, 2) and has radius:
22+ˉ22ˉ1=4+4+1=9=3\displaystyle \sqrt{2^2+ˉ2^2-ˉ1}=\sqrt{4+4+1}=\sqrt{9}=3

(2)2+(2)2(1) = 4+4+1 = 9 = 3\displaystyle \sqrt{(2)^2 + (-2)^2 - (-1)} \ = \ \sqrt{4 + 4 + 1} \ = \ \sqrt{9} \ = \ 3
 
(2)2+(2)2(1) = 4+4+1 = 9 = 3\displaystyle \sqrt{(2)^2 + (-2)^2 - (-1)} \ = \ \sqrt{4 + 4 + 1} \ = \ \sqrt{9} \ = \ 3 ???
Are you suggesting that ˉ2 is (somehow) a less valid representation of negative two than (-2)?
 
224, \displaystyle -2^2 \ne 4, \ but you have included the former in the middle of your radicand.
I beg to differ. I did not record 22\displaystyle -2^2 anywhere in the radicand!
I recorded ˉ22 (and ˉ22 ≡ ˉ2 × ˉ2 = 4).
 
Last edited:
I beg to differ. I did not record 22\displaystyle -2^2 anywhere in the radicand!
I recorded ˉ22 (and ˉ22 ≡ ˉ2 × ˉ2 = 4).
I would hope that you are just confused and do not teach the above..
While it is true that (2)(2)=(2)2=4(-2)(-2)=(-2)^2=4, it is false that 22=4.-2^2=4.
To be fair to @lookagain, you do use 22+221=4+4+1\sqrt{2^2\bf{+^-2^2-^-1}}=\sqrt{4+4+1},
when it should be =44+1=\sqrt{4-4+1} because 22=4.-2^2=-4.
 
I would hope that you are just confused and do not teach the above..
While it is true that (2)(2)=(2)2=4(-2)(-2)=(-2)^2=4, it is false that 22=4.-2^2=4.
To be fair to @lookagain, you do use 22+221=4+4+1\sqrt{2^2\bf{+^-2^2-^-1}}=\sqrt{4+4+1},
when it should be =44+1=\sqrt{4-4+1} because 22=4.-2^2=-4.
No, I am not at all confused.
I agree wholeheartedly that
22=ˉ4\displaystyle -2^2 = ˉ4 but I did not write 22\displaystyle -2^2!
I quite clearly wrote
ˉ22\displaystyle ˉ2^2 and ˉ2\displaystyle ˉ2 is just as valid a representation of negative two as (2)\displaystyle (-2) is! (and, Yes, I do teach that!)
Therefore
ˉ22=4\displaystyle ˉ2^2 = 4 not ˉ4\displaystyle ˉ4.
You both appear to be failing to recognize the difference between an operator and a sign!
 
I, lookagain, am rewriting ˉ22 as ˉ1*22


equal   to   negative   four.\displaystyle \text{equal \ \ to \ \ negative \ \ four.}

The exponent operates on the 2 first, and then the result is negated.
 


equal   to   negative   four.\displaystyle \text{equal \ \ to \ \ negative \ \ four.}

The exponent operates on the 2 first, and then the result is negated.
Where on earth did I say: "I, lookagain, am rewriting ˉ22 as ˉ1*22" ???

You are trying to put words in my mouth now?

I have not written any such thing anywhere (because it is utter drivel!)

ˉ22=ˉ2 ×ˉ2=4 \displaystyle ˉ2^2 = ˉ2\ \timesˉ2 = 4 \ because ˉ2\displaystyle ˉ2 is negative two not minus two!

You are still refusing to recognize the difference between an operator and a sign!

(So I refuse to respond any further to any of this nonsense!)


Go look
here.
 
Where on earth did I say: "I, lookagain, am rewriting ˉ22 as ˉ1*22" ???

You are trying to put words in my mouth now?

I have not written any such thing anywhere (because it is utter drivel!)

ˉ22=ˉ2 ×ˉ2=4 \displaystyle ˉ2^2 = ˉ2\ \timesˉ2 = 4 \ because ˉ2\displaystyle ˉ2 is negative two not minus two!

You are still refusing to recognize the difference between an operator and a sign!

(So I refuse to respond any further to any of this nonsense!)


Go look
here.
You are using the raised negative as an indicator of a negative number, and assuming that it is not treated as a separate operator. I don't know how standard that is; can you provide a reliable source to demonstrate that fact?

In any case, since it is not well known, you need to state the meaning of your notation before using it, in order to avoid confusing people.
 
Top