Divisors

It is. I hope you understand why and not just making a lucky guess.
hey sorry for getting this active again but i did this problem again today and i have a question
i found 5 prime divisors 2, 3, 5, 167, 401
2^n = 2^5 = 32 - this is the answer

however
what about 1? shouldn't we include it in prime divisors?
 
hey sorry for getting this active again but i did this problem again today and i have a question
i found 5 prime divisors 2, 3, 5, 167, 401
2^n = 2^5 = 32 - this is the answer

however
what about 1? shouldn't we include it in prime divisors?
One is not a prime number. You should know that.
 
hey sorry for getting this active again but i did this problem again today and i have a question
i found 5 prime divisors 2, 3, 5, 167, 401
2^n = 2^5 = 32 - this is the answer

however
what about 1? shouldn't we include it in prime divisors?
There are reasons not to count 1 as a divisor. With prime numbers there is a unique representation for each natural number m=p1k1p2k2...pnknm= p_1^{k_1} p_2^{k_2}...p_n^{k_n}, e.g. 75=523175=5^2 \cdot 3^1. But with 1 any power, including 0, can be included. I.e., the representation is no longer unique.
 
hey sorry for getting this active again but i did this problem again today and i have a question
i found 5 prime divisors 2, 3, 5, 167, 401
2^n = 2^5 = 32 - this is the answer

however
what about 1? shouldn't we include it in prime divisors?
Suppose that the number nn has the prime factorization:
n=p1fp2jp3kp4hp5gn=p_1^f\cdot p_2^j\cdot p_3^k\cdot p_4^h\cdot p_5^g\cdot.
From that we see that nn has (f+1)(j+1)(k+1)(h+1)(g+1)(f+1)(j+1)(k+1)(h+1)(g+1) divisors.
Example: 396000=253253111396000=2^5\cdot 3^2\cdot 5^3\cdot 11^1 has (6)(3)(4)(2)=144(6)(3)(4)(2)=144 divisors.
SEE HERE
 
Top