D
Deleted member 4993
Guest
I think the confusion is arising from the fact that - we are not explicitly using the "multiplication" sign (which in computers is expressed by '*' symbol).I'm trying to keep this simple:
First of all P + Pr has a common factor of P, so it can be expressed as P(1 + r).
I want to know how the "P" gets in front of (1 +r) to become P(1 + r). If I divide P + Pr by P, I get (1 + r), so how does the P get in front of (1 + r) as in P(1 + r)?
It should be explicitly written as:
P + Pr \(\displaystyle \ \ \to \ \ \)(writing multiplication explicitly\(\displaystyle \to \ \ \)) = P + P*r = P*1 + P*r = P * (1 + r) \(\displaystyle \ \ \to \ \ \)(removing '*' making multiplication implicit)\(\displaystyle \to \ \ \)= P(1+r)