BigBeachBanana
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2021
- Messages
- 2,276
Truthfully I don't see an analytical approach to calculating the answer. However, since this is a multiple-choice, we can do trial and error.
Suppose (44+y) = 50 , 55, 60 then x = -16,-3.5, 9 using (141+x)/(44+y)=2.5. Since x can't be negative, 60 overs is the only plausible answer.
This means the second partnership scored 9 runs/ 16 overs. It follows, Telkundar has 30overs to score (360-141-9)=210 runs to win.
Telkundar needs a 210/30=7runs/over to win the game. What troubles me is that when y=61, Telkundar still only requires a run rate of 7.155runs/over. It is not until y=66(after 65 overs) that the required run rate is >8 when Telkudnar can't win.
After 65 overs [imath]\neq[/imath] After 60 overs
Suppose (44+y) = 50 , 55, 60 then x = -16,-3.5, 9 using (141+x)/(44+y)=2.5. Since x can't be negative, 60 overs is the only plausible answer.
This means the second partnership scored 9 runs/ 16 overs. It follows, Telkundar has 30overs to score (360-141-9)=210 runs to win.
Telkundar needs a 210/30=7runs/over to win the game. What troubles me is that when y=61, Telkundar still only requires a run rate of 7.155runs/over. It is not until y=66(after 65 overs) that the required run rate is >8 when Telkudnar can't win.
After 65 overs [imath]\neq[/imath] After 60 overs
Last edited: