I would start with proper use of parenthesis: is it e^ln(4)+i or e^(ln(4)+i) ?Can I use this form
First, when you say "modulo" do you mean "modulus", also called "absolute value"? The term "modulo" is used in number theory for something very different.z = e^(ln(4) + i)
= e^ln(4) * e^i
= 4 e^i
Can I use this form
e^i = cos(0) + isin(0)
= 1 + 0
= 1
So its 4?
Because [imath]e^{\log(4)}=4[/imath] your [imath]z=4+i[/imath].What is the modulo of z = e^ln(4) + i?
Since e0=1, it is not true that ei=1e^i = cos(0) + isin(0)
= 1 + 0
= 1
Technically, that's not a good argument. Would you say that since e0 = 1, it can't be true that e2i = 1?Since e0=1, it is not true that ei=1
I think it's reasonably clear that you meant, as I modified it when I answered, z = e^(ln(4) + i), since only that agrees with your next line.z = e^ln(4) + i
= e^ln(4) * e^i
= 4 e^i
Just copy the formula you are applying, and you should see it.e^i = cos(0) + isin(0)
= 1 + 0
= 1
I think you meant e^(2pi*i) = 1.Technically, that's not a good argument. Would you say that since e0 = 1, it can't be true that e2i = 1?
You passed the test.I think you meant e^(2pi*i) = 1.
I knew as soon as I made that post that I was wrong.