extrazlove
New member
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2019
- Messages
- 9
hello
Here is a Zn Suite
Z3 = 1/2
Zn= Zn+1 / \cos (pi / n)
It's a bizarre suite decreasing to 0 without ever going.
I will define the n with which I work in my suite so as not to fall into absurdities like 1/0 which gives false calculations.
find that
n = pi / arccos (Zn+1 / Zn)
Note that Zn #0 and Zn+1/ Zn #1
so the Zn+1 limit is non-zero.
And since I have a decreasing sequence, Zn+1 / Zn < 1, so the series Zn is convergent according to the d'Alembert criterion.
Is there an error in this reasoning?
Zn is a positive term and is decreasing and minus 0 tends to 0 minus bound 0, which is impossible because Zn #0?
Here is a Zn Suite
Z3 = 1/2
Zn= Zn+1 / \cos (pi / n)
It's a bizarre suite decreasing to 0 without ever going.
I will define the n with which I work in my suite so as not to fall into absurdities like 1/0 which gives false calculations.
find that
n = pi / arccos (Zn+1 / Zn)
Note that Zn #0 and Zn+1/ Zn #1
so the Zn+1 limit is non-zero.
And since I have a decreasing sequence, Zn+1 / Zn < 1, so the series Zn is convergent according to the d'Alembert criterion.
Is there an error in this reasoning?
Zn is a positive term and is decreasing and minus 0 tends to 0 minus bound 0, which is impossible because Zn #0?