[?tex] \sqrt[m]{a^b}[/tex] → \(\displaystyle \sqrt[m]{a^b}\)How do I write this in Latex. That's expression number 6,7 and 9. It is in the attachment.
I have not even asked for help concerning the problem. Am concerned with showing the expression in Latex. When I need help concerning the problem I would want to write in Latex, then I will show what I have tried and exactly where am stuck. Then I will start the thread in the appropriate topic. For now, I just need help with Latex.Please show us what you have tried and exactly where you are stuck.
Thanks for the one you showed me. Did you see expression number 9.How do I write it Latex?In the line above, remove "?" and you would have the "LaTex" code for \displaystyle \sqrt[m]{a^b}mab
Check out the last three links above.
I believe he was asking you to show what Latex you had tried, so we could see where you needed help with that. We still don't know!I have not even asked for help concerning the problem. Am concerned with showing the expression in Latex. When I need help concerning the problem I would want to write in Latex, then I will show what I have tried and exactly where am stuck. Then I will start the thread in the appropriate topic. For now, I just need help with Latex.
Okay. I will try but not now. May be when am less busy. Expect my trial soon. Thank you.I believe he was asking you to show what Latex you had tried, so we could see where you needed help with that. We still don't know!
Thank you so much. These links will be very useful.Check out the last three links above.
?
[imath]\;[/imath]
You should be aware that the delimiters for LaTeX are not consistent from site to site.Thank you so much. These links will be very useful.
That's why I was asking for help concerning number 9. Because I was dealing particularly with this site.You should be aware that the delimiters for LaTeX are not consistent from site to site
Just to be sure, the LaTeX delimiters (AKA tags) are what enclose the LaTeX codes and tell the system which style to use. You can find the delimiters with style options described in the LaTeX thread from which I'd quoted those reference links earlier. (Click the link "mmm4444bot said:" in post #4.)That's why I was asking for help concerning number 9.
OK I will go through it once am less busy.(Click the link "mmm4444bot said:" in post #4.)
There's also information in that thread to help with number 9.
?
9. \(\displaystyle \frac{2.874^3+6}{2.874^3-6}\)
6. \(\displaystyle \sqrt{61.73^2-38.27^2}\)
7. \(\displaystyle 3.025^3-\sqrt{4}{759.4}\)
Extra \(\displaystyle \sqrt{\frac{173.8×14.7^2}{2.61^3}
\)
I have made an attempt to show what have in mind in post 12. Can you help me with the last one. As you can see am stuck in it?Please show us what you have tried and exactly where you are stuck.
Please follow the rules of posting in this forum, as enunciated a
Please share your work/thoughts about this problem
For 9.This is what I want to show:
Two things. First, when I code I put spaces in to remind me where I need to end { } symbols. You didn't close the square root:If you look at my post 12. Am having problem where I wrote extra. I uploaded image because I did not include in the beginning of the thread.
Thanks I have seen the error. I think I will be more careful next time.Two things. First, when I code I put spaces in to remind me where I need to end { } symbols. You didn't close the square root:
\sqrt{\frac{173.8×14.7^2}{2.61^3}
vs
\sqrt{\frac{173.8×14.7^2}{2.61^3}}
I would have typed this in as
\sqrt{ \frac{173.8×14.7^2}{2.61^3} } gives [imath] \sqrt{ \frac{173.8×14.7^2}{2.61^3} } [/imath]
I would add one caution. LaTex is very finicky about formatting. So if I am trying to post a "problem" - l would first type it out using "in-line ASCII" format. Then if I have time, I would rewrite the problem in LaTex.Thanks I have seen the error. I think I will be more careful next time.
Which one online "on-line ASCII" format? How can I make use of it?So if I am trying to post a "problem" - l would first type it out using "on-line ASCII" format. Then if I have time, I would rewrite the problem in LaTex.