Truth table: is (P→Q)∧(Q→P) logically equivalent to (P∨Q)∧(¬P∨¬Q) ?
Hi all, I am a bit confused about this truth table that I have copied down during my lessons.
The question is Use a truth table to determine whether the statement (P→Q)∧(Q→P) is logically equivalent to (P∨Q)∧(¬P∨¬Q)
This is the truth table that I have written down:
What I am confused now is if the fourth column is it really needed (⇔) for this question?
While compiling my notes, there is another similar question where it asks if (P→Q) is logically equivalent to ¬P∨Q and that particular column (⇔) is not shown in the truth table, I assume that is because the result of (P→Q) and ¬P∨Q is the same, hence enough said?
And so, is that column needed? Otherwise, under what sort of scenario or how are the questions being phrased that would requires me to use ⇔?
Hi all, I am a bit confused about this truth table that I have copied down during my lessons.
The question is Use a truth table to determine whether the statement (P→Q)∧(Q→P) is logically equivalent to (P∨Q)∧(¬P∨¬Q)
This is the truth table that I have written down:
P | Q | (P→Q)∧(Q→P) | ⇔ | (P∨Q)∧(¬P∨¬Q) |
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
What I am confused now is if the fourth column is it really needed (⇔) for this question?
While compiling my notes, there is another similar question where it asks if (P→Q) is logically equivalent to ¬P∨Q and that particular column (⇔) is not shown in the truth table, I assume that is because the result of (P→Q) and ¬P∨Q is the same, hence enough said?
And so, is that column needed? Otherwise, under what sort of scenario or how are the questions being phrased that would requires me to use ⇔?