This is an Inst. Velocity Question, correct?

JSmith

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
120
A manufacturer of tennis balls determines that the profit from the sale of x cans of tennis balls per week measured in hundreds is given by the function P(x) = 180x - 2x2, where P is measured in dollars. Determine the rate of cans of tennis balls being sold for x = 3.

Just use the instantaneous velocity formula and solve. correct?
 
A manufacturer of tennis balls determines that the profit from the sale of x cans of tennis balls per week measured in hundreds is given by the function P(x) = 180x - 2x2, where P is measured in dollars. Determine the rate of cans of tennis balls being sold for x = 3.

Just use the instantaneous velocity formula and solve. correct?
This question as you have written it makes no sense whatsoever.

The variable P seems to represent dollars. Initially x seems to be defined as a rate, x cans of balls per week. Then it seems to be a price: "determine the rate ... being sold for x." If x is the rate and x = 3 then the rate is 3.

What is the exact wording of the problem and what course was it given in?
 
A manufacturer of tennis balls determines that the profit from the sale of x cans of tennis balls per week measured in hundreds is given by the function P(x) = 180x - 2x2, where P is measured in dollars. Determine the rate of cans of tennis balls being sold for x = 3.

Just use the instantaneous velocity formula and solve. correct?
It seems x has units of (100 cans)/week. If that is true, then x=3 means the rate of cans being sold is 300 cans/week.

Please be sure you have copied the complete question, and also show us your work so we can understand betteer where you are getting stuck. Explain what you mean by "instantaneous velocity formula."
 
I posted the question in its entirety. I was thinking that potentially the question was using the term "rate" of cans of tennis balls being sold because it wanted me to use the following instantaneous velocity formula;
showimage
which is basically finding the slope of the tangent at x=3? Or could I just find the slope of the tangent at x=3?
 
I am guessing the "rate" here means "price" (as in "hotel rate" or "ticket rate").

So, it could be just the value P(x) - evaluated at x = 3.
 
Could the "rate" refer to the rate at which the balls were balls being sold which would be the instantaneous rate of change at x=3, and therefore the slope of the tangent at x=3? This would make more sense going by what we have recently covered.....

This is what I wrote...
Assuming the question is asking for the rate of balls being sold, as in the tangent at x=3, the following is true:

showimage
 
Last edited:
Could the "rate" refer to the rate at which the balls were balls being sold which would be the instantaneous rate of change at x=3, and therefore the slope of the tangent at x=3? This would make more sense going by what we have recently covered.....This is what I wrote...
Assuming the question is asking for the rate of balls being sold, as in the tangent at x=3, the following is true:
I agree that the intention of the question was most likely that you should find the slope of the tangent - but just what is that slope? P(x) is weekly profit in dollars. The question you will be answering is, "What is the rate of change of profit with respect to sales volume, when sales equal 300 cans per week?" Keep track of units.

\(\displaystyle P(x) = 180x - 2x^2 \; \; \; \; \; \)gives Profit ($ per week)
\(\displaystyle P(3) = 180(3) - 2(3)x^2 \)
\(\displaystyle P(3) = $522\; per\ week\)

The slope of the tangent of P(x) at (3, 522) is

\(\displaystyle \displaystyle \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \dfrac{P(3+h) - P(3)}{h}\; \; \; \; \)P is $/week and h is 100 cans/week, so the ratio is $/(100 cans)

\(\displaystyle \displaystyle \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \dfrac{180(3+h)-180(3)-2(3+h)^2+2(3)^2}{h}\)

\(\displaystyle \displaystyle \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \dfrac{180\ h -12\ h - 2\ h^2}{h}\)

\(\displaystyle \displaystyle \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \dfrac{178\ h - 2\ h^2}{h}\)

\(\displaystyle \displaystyle \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \left( 178 - 2\ h\right) = $178 \; per\ 100\ cans\)

BTW, you had an arithmetic error, 180-12=178. Other than that, your method to find the slope was correct - too bad that isn't what the question actually asked for - but probably intended.
 
Last edited:
Top