the laws of logic

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can you provide a reference to a list where these LAWs are enunciated?
for a starter :
1)INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC fifth edition by
IRVING M.COPI
At last two pages of the book there is a list of the propositional logic rules as well those of the predicate calculus
A pioneer in logic . That book should be taught in the last classess of a high school
2)FIRST ORDER MATHEMATICAL LOGIC by
ANGELO MARGARIS
In the pages 71 and 72 there is a list of the propoditional rules whilst in the pages 89 to 90 there is a list of theorem scheemes in predicate calculus
The development of the laws of logic in this book is puarly axiomatic
In the 1st book we have natural deduction development of the laws of logic
In schaum's series there is an excellent book called logic there a superb development of the natural deduction rules
This book is also suitable for high school classess
Many other books of logic that i have in my library.
But my question remains unanswered
 
Yes. A law of logic a valid argument.

Your question is now answered.

I suppose you will next try to posit that a valid mathematical argument may be illogical.

Good luck with persuading anyone of that.
 
I could go further to ask what is valid argument .
But just leave it there
 
`is a law of logic a valid argument yes or no

If this is a "challenge question," then state it as such. Please write your posts
in English sentences.

If it is not a challenge question, then you need to add some work with your
question. There are rules for the Forum. However, if you continue to
ignore the rules, including being argumentative with helpers in different threads
who are taking the time and effort to try to discuss a topic with you, then I will
recommend a type of ban for you.
 
`is a law of logic a valid argument yes or no

My claim is that chrislav is the same individual ** who went by the name psolaki
in the Math Help Forum, which was being moderated by topsquark. psolaki had a thread named "What is the connection between an argument and a law of logic?"
It was posted on Oct. 13, 2021. It included in its posts "Is a law of logic an argument?"
They both mentioned the author Copi. After many posts back and forth, topsquark had that thread locked.

Now I feel that this thread should be locked as well. Also, chrislav is being argumentative, disrespectful, ignoring rules, etc. in different threads.
I recommend a type of ban if he will not disclose his motivation about what
type of problem he is making when he posts, if he will not stop being
argumentative, etc.

** It is not an issue that a person uses a different username in two or more
sites.
 
Last edited:
My claim is that chrislav is the same individual who went by the name psolaki in the
Math Help Forum, which was being moderated by topsquark. psolaki had a thread
named "What is the connection between an argument and a law of logic?" It was
posted on Oct. 13, 2021. It included in its posts "Is a law of logic an argument?"
He mentioned the author Copi. After many posts back and forth, topsquark had
that thread locked.

Now I feel that this thread should be locked as well. Also, chrislav is being argumentative, disrespectful, ignoring rules, etc. in different threads.
I recommend a type of ban if he will not disclose his motivation about what
type of problem he is making when he posts, if he will not stop being
argumentative, etc.
what solid proof have you got that psolaki and me are the same person
If two different persons happen to have the same ideas does that mean that are one and the same person.?
disrespectful ? how, show me the particular post so i can apologize
Any way let me look into the matter in more details and then you can ban me
how many different people in the same forum have asked the same question
How many
different people have read irving copi?

. Please write your posts
in English sentences.

What that suppose to mean please explain
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top