In a best of 3 tennis match, player A wins 6-2, 6-2 against player B
You can clearly see that player B has won 4 of the 16 games played, ie 1/4 of the games.
And if you work out the average score of the sets, it would be "(2/8 + 2/8) / 2" = 1/4, which works out at a 6-2 scoreline
If Player A wins 6-1, 6-3 then again Player B wins 4 of the 16 matches, and you'd assume that the average of the set scores would again be 6-2. But if you work it out, it's not.
(1/7 + 3/9) / 2 = ( 9/63 + 21/63 ) / 2 = 30/63 / 2 = 15/63 = 5/21
Can someone explain where the logic goes wrong.
You can clearly see that player B has won 4 of the 16 games played, ie 1/4 of the games.
And if you work out the average score of the sets, it would be "(2/8 + 2/8) / 2" = 1/4, which works out at a 6-2 scoreline
If Player A wins 6-1, 6-3 then again Player B wins 4 of the 16 matches, and you'd assume that the average of the set scores would again be 6-2. But if you work it out, it's not.
(1/7 + 3/9) / 2 = ( 9/63 + 21/63 ) / 2 = 30/63 / 2 = 15/63 = 5/21
Can someone explain where the logic goes wrong.