Substitution method: which linear expression is NOT a factor

fencer817

New member
Joined
Dec 15, 2006
Messages
13
I have a really hard problem solving these HELP!

. . .3x^4 - 10x^3 - 29x^2 + 16x + 20

I am trying to find which linear expression doesn't work as a factor.

. . .x + 2, . . . 3x + 2, . . . x + 5, . . . x - 1
 
Sadly, there is nothing to solve. Did you mean:

3x^4 - 10x^3 - 29x^2 + 16x + 20 = 0?

If there are Rational Number solutions, they are factors of 20 divided by factors of 3. So,

20, 20/3
10, 10/3
5, 5/3
4, 4/3
2,2/3
1,1/3

Positive or negative. There! The possibilities for Rational Number solutions are whittled down to only 24.

There is a sneaky trick for this sort of thing. It's called Horner's Method. It requires LOTS of parentheses to describe, but only a litte effort to demonstrate.

Let's try x = 1, jut for fun. Watch the coefficients fly...

3x^4 - 10x^3 - 29x^2 + 16x + 20 = 0

3*1 = 3
(3-10)*1 = -7
(-7-29)*1 = -36
(-36+16)*1 = -20
(-20+20) = 0 <== No "*1" on the last one.

Cool!!! We found a solution. Guess what else we found? The factorization that goes with that solution. Check out the values on the right of the equal signs.

3x^4 - 10x^3 - 29x^2 + 16x + 20 = (x-1)(3x^3 - 7x^2 - 36x - 20) = 0

Since the new cubic polynomial has the same leading coefficient and constant term, start over with the same list.

Note: In case someone is wondering, Horner's Method should look awfully familiar to Synthetic Division users.
 
Thanks that helps and to answer your question. No, sadly she didn't put an =0 on the end. The question stated: Use substitution to determine which of the given linear expressions is not a factor of 3x^4 - 10x^3 - 29x^2 + 16x + 20. Then she listed the answers. She left me hanging to solve it and i didn't even know what i was solving.
 
Re: Substitution method

fencer817 said:
3x^4 - 10x^3 - 29x^2 + 16x + 20
I am trying to find which liner expression doesn't work as a factor.
x + 2 , 3x + 2 , x + 5 , x - 1
Use the root/factor theorem:
ckeck to see if any of -2, -2/3, -5, or 1 is a root.
 
And thus we see how much nicer things are when we have the entire problem statement from the beginning. :cry:
 
Top