D
Deleted member 4993
Guest
Write down any natural number, reverse its digits to form a new number, and add the two:
871
178
------
1049
In most cases, repeating this procedure eventually yields a palindrome:
1049
9401
-------
10450
10450
05401
--------
15851
With 196, perversely, it does not — or, at least, it hasn’t in computer trials, which have repeated the process until it produced numbers 300 million digits long.
Is 196 somehow immune to producing palindromes? No one’s yet offered a conclusive proof — so we don’t know
reference:
http://www.futilitycloset.com/2010/03/07/stubborn/
871
178
------
1049
In most cases, repeating this procedure eventually yields a palindrome:
1049
9401
-------
10450
10450
05401
--------
15851
With 196, perversely, it does not — or, at least, it hasn’t in computer trials, which have repeated the process until it produced numbers 300 million digits long.
Is 196 somehow immune to producing palindromes? No one’s yet offered a conclusive proof — so we don’t know
reference:
http://www.futilitycloset.com/2010/03/07/stubborn/