Hello everyone,
First poster here. I have a problem that I've been having an issue figuring out how they get the final answer.
I am using this equation:
. . . . .\(\displaystyle X\, =\, 0.9959\, -\, 0.000442T_E\, -\, \ln\big[\left(P_S\, +\, 6.8\right)\, 0.03218\, \left(P_S\, +\, 374\right)^{-0.0001581TE}\big]\qquad \left(\mbox{Eqn. 4}\right)\)
They give an example that if you use Te = 250, Ps = 200, and you should get a result of 0.9649. I tried to work this a few times by the following:
Any thoughts on what's going on or what I am missing to solve this?
Thanks,
Greg
First poster here. I have a problem that I've been having an issue figuring out how they get the final answer.
I am using this equation:
. . . . .\(\displaystyle X\, =\, 0.9959\, -\, 0.000442T_E\, -\, \ln\big[\left(P_S\, +\, 6.8\right)\, 0.03218\, \left(P_S\, +\, 374\right)^{-0.0001581TE}\big]\qquad \left(\mbox{Eqn. 4}\right)\)
They give an example that if you use Te = 250, Ps = 200, and you should get a result of 0.9649. I tried to work this a few times by the following:
- First I tried to just plug it all into Wolfram Alpha and it gave me -0.758854
- Based on that wrong answer, I tried to figure out the value that needed to be logged to get the wrong answer and found out that it should be 0.92358
- Now with that value I tried to work it backwards to say what value of Te and Ps needs to be to make that happen, they didn't equal 250, 200 like it should be
- I also tried to see that maybe it was a different log base for some reason and found the log base that it would require to make that number work for Ps and Te but it didn't work if I put in other numbers and tried to solve.
Any thoughts on what's going on or what I am missing to solve this?
Thanks,
Greg
Attachments
Last edited by a moderator: