mathgalpsu
New member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2006
- Messages
- 1
I am briefly explaining geometric prob. to my class. We used two dice and
rolled until we got double 6's. The students understand that the
probability of getting it on the first roll is 1/36, the second is
(5/36)*(1/36), etc. I explained when we did the pdf that each time we are
multiplying by a number less than 1, so as n gets larger, the prob.
becomes less (we were looking at a histogram). They understood that until
we got to mean. When they found that the mean is 36, they got confused.
They are asking, "Shouldn't the probability at X=36 be higher than at
X=1?" (Which was a point I made during binomial prob.) I explained again
about multiplying by a number less than 1. They got the math, but it
isn't intuitive. The pdf indicates that there is a higher probability of
getting double 6's on the first roll than on the second, third,
thirty-sixth, etc. I don't really know what to say. Am I explaining it
(or understanding it) incorrectly? This is the first time I've taught
this class from this book.
rolled until we got double 6's. The students understand that the
probability of getting it on the first roll is 1/36, the second is
(5/36)*(1/36), etc. I explained when we did the pdf that each time we are
multiplying by a number less than 1, so as n gets larger, the prob.
becomes less (we were looking at a histogram). They understood that until
we got to mean. When they found that the mean is 36, they got confused.
They are asking, "Shouldn't the probability at X=36 be higher than at
X=1?" (Which was a point I made during binomial prob.) I explained again
about multiplying by a number less than 1. They got the math, but it
isn't intuitive. The pdf indicates that there is a higher probability of
getting double 6's on the first roll than on the second, third,
thirty-sixth, etc. I don't really know what to say. Am I explaining it
(or understanding it) incorrectly? This is the first time I've taught
this class from this book.