potatocount
New member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2012
- Messages
- 5
Good day Sirs and Madams,
I have a random question, I was thinking about the 2012th term in the Fibonacci Sequence using the nth term formula:
[**sorry I don't know how to format the equation correctly. I preview it but still doesn't work.]
yes there is a formula for computing the nth term in the fibonacci how can I compute it if i have such a large n like 2012.
I tried to solve it manually since online calculators and my calculator can't compute such large number.
First, i tried using LOG just to see how many digits the 2012th term has, and to know how big is the number i'm dealing with. I used this formula:
the answer is 420 digits. That's really a big big number.
Second, if my n is 1000, there are very few numbers [22 F Values] to compute to get F(1000) by using the formula in Dijktra's Note (1979) as follows:
The problem is, I am looking for a way larger term. I am quite stuck on this one and I think I cannot sleep.
I want to prohibit myself from using online Fibonacci Calculators, they can't compute larger nth terms as well.
As much as possible I want to solve this using an ordinary scientific calculator,
if only my calculator could solve Phi^2012 then this wouldn't be much of a problem.
I am pretty much stuck. Anyone wants to shed some light on this one? Thanks!
I have a random question, I was thinking about the 2012th term in the Fibonacci Sequence using the nth term formula:
Code:
[B]F(n) = (Phi^n - (-Phi^n)) / sqrt (5)[/B]
[**sorry I don't know how to format the equation correctly. I preview it but still doesn't work.]
yes there is a formula for computing the nth term in the fibonacci how can I compute it if i have such a large n like 2012.
I tried to solve it manually since online calculators and my calculator can't compute such large number.
First, i tried using LOG just to see how many digits the 2012th term has, and to know how big is the number i'm dealing with. I used this formula:
Code:
[B](n)LOG_10 (Phi) - (log5/2) [/B]
the answer is 420 digits. That's really a big big number.
Second, if my n is 1000, there are very few numbers [22 F Values] to compute to get F(1000) by using the formula in Dijktra's Note (1979) as follows:
Code:
[LIST]
[*][FONT=verdana][SIZE=2]F(1000) needs F(500) and F(499)[/SIZE][/FONT]
[*][FONT=verdana][SIZE=2]F(500) and
F(499) need F(250) and F(249)[/SIZE][/FONT]
[*][FONT=verdana][SIZE=2]F(250) and
F(249) need F(124) and F(125)[/SIZE][/FONT]
[*][FONT=verdana][SIZE=2]F(124) needs F(61) and F(62)[/SIZE][/FONT]
[*][FONT=verdana][SIZE=2]F(125) needs F(62) and F(63)[/SIZE][/FONT]
[*][FONT=verdana][SIZE=2]F(63) needs F(32) and F(31)[/SIZE][/FONT]
[*][FONT=verdana][SIZE=2]F(62) and
F(61) needs F(31) and F(30)[/SIZE][/FONT]
[*][FONT=verdana][SIZE=2]F(32) and
F(31) need F(16) and F(15)[/SIZE][/FONT]
[*][FONT=verdana][SIZE=2]F(30) needs F(15) and F(14)[/SIZE][/FONT]
[*][FONT=verdana][SIZE=2]F(16) and
F(15) need F(8) and F(7)[/SIZE][/FONT]
[*][FONT=verdana][SIZE=2]F(14) needs F(7) and F(6)[/SIZE][/FONT]
[*][FONT=verdana][SIZE=2]F(8) and
F(7) need F(4) and F(3)[/SIZE][/FONT]
[*][FONT=verdana][SIZE=2]F(6) needs F(3) and F(2)[/SIZE][/FONT]
[*][FONT=verdana][SIZE=2]F(4) and
F(3) need F(2) and F(1)[/SIZE][/FONT]
[*][FONT=verdana][SIZE=2]F(2) needs F(1) and F(0)[/SIZE][/FONT]
[*][FONT=verdana][SIZE=2]F(1) and
F(0) are 1 and 0 by definition[/SIZE][/FONT]
[/LIST]
The problem is, I am looking for a way larger term. I am quite stuck on this one and I think I cannot sleep.
I want to prohibit myself from using online Fibonacci Calculators, they can't compute larger nth terms as well.
As much as possible I want to solve this using an ordinary scientific calculator,
if only my calculator could solve Phi^2012 then this wouldn't be much of a problem.
I am pretty much stuck. Anyone wants to shed some light on this one? Thanks!