rachelmaddie
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2019
- Messages
- 851
This is 5th root, not 5*sqrt.View attachment 20810
Hi. Can some please check my work?
Solve
6 + 5*sqrt(249 - 2x) = 7.
sqrt(249 - 2x) = 1/5 =>
249 - 2x = 1/25 =>
2x = 248.96 and x = 124.48.
Hows this?BIG HINT
[MATH]6 + \sqrt[5]{249 - 2x} = 7 \implies[/MATH]
[MATH]\sqrt[5]{249 - 2x} = 7 - 6 = 1.[/MATH]
That is fine except that you should check your work.Hows this?
Solve
6 + 5*√249 - 2x) = 7 - 6
(5*√249 - 2x)^5 =(1)^5
249 - 2x = 1 —> -
-2x/-2 = -248/2 = 124
SolveThat is fine except that you should check your work.
[MATH]6 + \sqrt[5]{249 - 2 * 124}=\\ 6 + \sqrt[5]{249 - 248} = \\ 6 + \sqrt[5]{1} = 6 + 1 = 7 \checkmark.[/MATH]
Is that wrong?TO rachelmaddie: NO, NO, NONO.
first please learn some basic LaTeX. \sqrt[5]{249-2x}\ gives \(\sqrt[5]{249-2x}\)
Can you solve \(249-2x=1~?\)
No the answer to your post is \(x=124\).Is that wrong?
So my work is correct?No the answer to your post is \(x=124\).
That answers: \(249-2x=1\)
Which in turn answes \(\large 6+\sqrt[5]{249-2x}=7\)
It is not 5 times the square root of (249 - 2x), which is what you wrote above. It is the fifth root of (249 - 2x). Your notation is wrong. Because you do not know LaTeX, you need to write something likeSolve
6 + 5*√249 - 2x) = 7
Subtract 6 on each side.
This gives you:
5*√249 - 2x = 1
Raise each side to the power of 5.
(5*√249 - 2x)^5 = (1)^5
Cancel the 5 out on the left side and the root sign.
249 - 2x = 1
I believe you had the right idea, but your notation will suggest to people that you got the right answer by accident.Subtract 249 on each side of the equation. This gives you
-2x = -248
Lastly, divide by -2 on both sides. This gives you
x = 124
Therefore, your answer is x = 124.
Hi Rachel. One way to text radicals is to type the index inside brackets:5*sqrt(249 - 2x)
No, I’m not. I’m 19It is not 5 times the square root of (249 - 2x), which is what you wrote above. It is the fifth root of (249 - 2x). Your notation is wrong. Because you do not know LaTeX, you need to write something like
6 + fifth root of (249 - 2x) = 7 OR, if you know about fractional exponents 6 + (249 - 2x)^(1/5)
Correct
Same misuse of notation as above
So fifth root of (249 - 2x) = 1 OR (249 - 2x)^(1/5) =1
You have the right idea but the wrong notation.
Raise the fifth root of (249 - 2x) to the fifth power = 1^ 5or {(249 - 2x)^(1/5)}^5 = 1^5
You have the right idea, but the wrong notation. You cannot cancel powers and coefficients.
I believe you had the right idea, but your notation will suggest to people that you got the right answer by accident.
I suspect that you are about 14 or 15. If that is right, I cannot support pka's suggestion that you learn LaTeX, which is a very fussy language, when you are having trouble understanding the algebra that you are trying hard to learn. One thing at a time. But you do need to be careful with your notation. Otherwise no one will understand what you are saying.
In that case, if you are studying mathematics at the college level, it might be worthwhile to to study how LaTeX works by hitting reply with quote and looking at the code.No, I’m not. I’m 19
That's how I learned (some) latex.it might be worthwhile to to study how LaTeX works by hitting reply with quote and looking at the code.
Is this better?It is not 5 times the square root of (249 - 2x), which is what you wrote above. It is the fifth root of (249 - 2x). Your notation is wrong. Because you do not know LaTeX, you need to write something like
6 + fifth root of (249 - 2x) = 7 OR, if you know about fractional exponents 6 + (249 - 2x)^(1/5)
Correct
Same misuse of notation as above
So fifth root of (249 - 2x) = 1 OR (249 - 2x)^(1/5) =1
You have the right idea but the wrong notation.
Raise the fifth root of (249 - 2x) to the fifth power = 1^ 5or {(249 - 2x)^(1/5)}^5 = 1^5
You have the right idea, but the wrong notation. You cannot cancel powers and coefficients.
I believe you had the right idea, but your notation will suggest to people that you got the right answer by accident.
I suspect that you are about 14 or 15. If that is right, I cannot support pka's suggestion that you learn LaTeX, which is a very fussy language, when you are having trouble understanding the algebra that you are trying hard to learn. One thing at a time. But you do need to be careful with your notation. Otherwise no one will understand what you are saying.
Which equation?That exactly is the logic needed to solve this equation. Very good.
When working with an unknown inside a root, a technique that frequently works is to get the root all by itself on one side of the equation (isolate the root), and then raise BOTH sides of the equation by the power that eliminates the root. Then you have a simpler equation without any root.
You follow that general process?