Single fraction, lowest terms

BlBl

New member
Joined
Oct 7, 2011
Messages
44
In the rational and radical expressions chapter of the book I'm going through I'm stumped as to how to make progress on these problems. The instructions are to, "Write as a single fraction in lowest terms. Do not rationalize denominators." Here's the first example:

\(\displaystyle \sqrt{x-2} +\frac{2}{\sqrt{x-2}}\)

With this I rationalized the numerator by multiplying the first side by \(\displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{x-2}}{\sqrt{x-2}}\) so I could have common denominators (even if not rational ones). This gave me

\(\displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{x-2}\cdot\sqrt{x-2}}{\sqrt{x-2}} +\frac{2}{\sqrt{x-2}}=\frac{x-2+2}{\sqrt{x-2}}=\frac{x}{\sqrt{x-2}}\)

That first problem made enough sense to me. But the subsequent problems tripped me up. The next example:

\(\displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{x^2-1}-\frac{x^2}{\sqrt{x^2-1}}}{x^2-1}\)

I was stuck at that point but the book said that I should multiply the whole thing (numerator and denominator) by the only internal denominator, \(\displaystyle \sqrt{x^2-1}\) which looks like

\(\displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{x^2-1}-\frac{x^2}{\sqrt{x^2-1}}}{x^2-1}\cdot\frac{\sqrt{x^2-1}}{\sqrt{x^2-1}}=\frac{x^2-1-x^2}{(x^2-1)\sqrt{x^2-1}}\)

I'm clear up to this point, but I don't understand the book when it writes the conclusion of problem. I suppose it's because I wasn't sure what

\(\displaystyle (x^2-1)\sqrt{x^2-1}\)

was supposed to equal. The books's final form for this was

\(\displaystyle -\frac{1}{(x^2-1)^{3/2}}\)

I can see how the numerator comes to negative 1, but the denominator eludes me. Help?
 
Hello, BlBl!


\(\displaystyle \text{You have: }\:a\cdot\!\sqrt{a} \;=\;\underbrace{\:a^1\!\cdot a^{\frac{1}{2}}}_{\text{add exponents}} \;=\;a^{\frac{3}{2}}\)
 
Ah, now I see. Thanks Soroban. I think my problem is that I was breaking things out of the parentheses and out of the radical when I should have been treating the expression as a group. For some reason my mind went to multiply x squared by radical x squared and so forth.

Alright the next question in the section isn't any easier, but I'll get back to you another time. I might have to start a new thread at this point.
 
Top