I have since fumbled my way through it to get the below answer, I am still 43ft from the workbook answer, do you think this matters or is my process correct?
Being able to see what you've done can be vitally important, yes!
(1) hg+hm=14000
(2) 13760-(0.1xhg+17.9x0.052xhm)=5000
Should we assume that "x" is a variable or (as seems more likely here) that it is being used to indicate multiplication? If the latter, is there any particular reason why the multiplications have not been simplified, to get a reduced system of equations?
. . . . .\(\displaystyle \mbox{(1) }\, h_g\, +\, h_m\, =\, 14000\)
. . . . .\(\displaystyle \mbox{(2) }\, 0.1\, h_g\, +\, 0.9308\, h_m\, =\, 18760\)
Substituting [the solved-for-hm version of (1)] into (2)
13760-(0.1*hg+17.9*0.052*(14000-hg)=5000
1.hg-1hg=-0.9hg
Where did the last line above come from? You started here:
. . . . .\(\displaystyle 13760\, -\, \left(0.1\,h_g\, +\, 0.9308\, \left(14000\, -\, h_g\right)\right)\, =\, 5000\)
. . . . .\(\displaystyle 13760\, -\, \left(0.1\, h_g\, +\, 0.9308\, (14000)\, +\, 0.9308\, \left(-h_g\right)\right)\, =\, 5000\)
. . . . .\(\displaystyle 13760\, -\, \left(0.1\, h_g\, +\, 13031.2\, -\, 0.9308\, h_g\right)\, =\, 5000\)
How did you get from this to the last line quoted above?
Please show
all of your steps. Thank you!