Show that cx^-1 is a solution to the differential equation dy/dx+y^2=0 only when c=1 or 0

Integrate

Junior Member
Joined
May 17, 2018
Messages
118
The original full question is here.



28. Constant Multiples of Solutions.

(a) Show that [imath]y = e^{-x}[/imath] is a solution of the linear equation:

(16) [imath]\dfrac{dy}{dx} + y = 0[/imath]

and [imath]y = x^{-1}[/imath] is a solution of the nonlinear equation

(17) [imath]\dfrac{dy}{dx} + y^2 = 0[/imath]

(b) Show that for any constant [imath]C[/imath], [imath]Ce^{-x}[/imath] is a solution of equation (16), while [imath]Cx^{-1}[/imath] is a solution of equation (17) only when [imath]C=0[/imath] or [imath]1[/imath].

(c) Show that for any linear equation of the form

[imath]\qquad \dfrac{dy}{dx} + P(x)y = 0[/imath]

if [imath]\hat{y}(x)[/imath] is a solution, then for any constant [imath]C[/imath] the function [imath]C\hat{y}(x)[/imath] is also a solution.




So I solved the linear differential to get 1/(x-c) and have set them equal to one another.
Where I get c(c-x+1) and I see that that c and c+1 are roots. I'm not sure if this is the right direction.
When searching the answer online I am giving this as a solution.

Screenshot 2023-07-15 162055.png

I understand that we can plug in to get (cx^-1)^2 but why is it d/dx(c^x-1) why is it not dy/dx(cx^-1)?


And in this solution an ln is introduced of which I have a hard time following.


Screenshot 2023-07-15 162259.png

Am I on the right track?
 

Attachments

  • ask question.png
    ask question.png
    161.6 KB · Views: 3
Last edited by a moderator:
The original full question is here.

View attachment 36126





So I solved the linear differential to get 1/(x-c) and have set them equal to one another.
Where I get c(c-x+1) and I see that that c and c+1 are roots. I'm not sure if this is the right direction.
When searching the answer online I am giving this as a solution.

View attachment 36128

I understand that we can plug in to get (cx^-1)^2 but why is it d/dx(c^x-1) why is it not dy/dx(cx^-1)?


And in this solution an ln is introduced of which I have a hard time following.


View attachment 36130

Am I on the right track?
You are mainly doing fine, (thought the thing with the ln isn't right... you can't separate that c out like that) but I think you might be going a little too far. I don't think the problem statement actually expected you to solve equation 17, just to plug [imath]Cx^{-1}[/imath] into it and show that it is a solution.

-Dan
 
Top