Sets : boundary exclusion parameters

ckyap

New member
Joined
Mar 3, 2014
Messages
6
Yeap's Predicament:

Given {C {C&M{M!C}k''''p''''\(\displaystyle \epsilon\)''''{M&B {M!B}k'''p'''\(\displaystyle \epsilon\)'''}k''p''\(\displaystyle \epsilon\)''}k'p'\(\displaystyle \epsilon\)'}kp\(\displaystyle \epsilon\).

Solve towards {C{M{B}}} where C = Christmas, M = Treacherous Men, and B = Young Bastards; k = knowledge, and e = power, \(\displaystyle \epsilon\) = economic trade-offs (AKA "crimes of passion"), granted time and distance are immaterial.
The problem of telepathically grabbing someone and feeding them into a machine that keeps feeding on the population has led to a predicament in that some people don't fit the variables assigned them. Could a combination of Knowledge, Power, Crimes of Passion a.k.a Economic Tradeoffs reduce this complex set relationship to what it was before? Can Math save the World in 72 hours? ;)
 
Last edited:
Yeap's Predicament

The problem of telepathically grabbing someone and feeding them into a machine that keeps feeding on the population …

I do not believe that this problem is solvable. :p That is, what are you talking about? Some computer game?

By the way, googling "Yeap's Predicament" returns only one hit, on the entire super-highway.
 
I do not believe that this problem is solvable. :p That is, what are you talking about? Some computer game?

I suppose Math isn't so (if not confounding) personal and abhorrent - it's like an outer limits episode of MacGyver. I've put it on Quora to see if anyone has any other takes on it.
 
Part II of Yeap's Predicament

Untitled.jpg

This is the Nash Equilibrium-esque ideal. The Math is much easier than Nash's.
 
Last edited:
Top