Set Theory

ofir

New member
Joined
Nov 19, 2020
Messages
4
I need to find an example that disprove each statement. A and B are sets. (It can be an infinity set)
1. P(A\B) = P(A) if and only if A and B are disjoint sets
2. If (AUB)\A = (B\A)UA then B ⊂ A. (B is not equal to the empty set)

Thank you.
 
I need to find an example that disprove each statement. A and B are sets. (It can be an infinity set)
1. P(A\B) = P(A) if and only if A and B are disjoint sets
2. If (AUB)\A = (B\A)UA then B ⊂ A. (B is not equal to the empty set)

Thank you.
since you did not show any work/thought about the problem, let us make sure we have understanding of common definitions.

Please tell us - What is the definition of disjointed set/s?

Please show us what you have tried and exactly where you are stuck.

Please follow the rules of posting in this forum, as enunciated at:


Please share your work/thoughts about this problem.
 
The definiation of disjointed sets are if x is a set and y is a set, they are disjointed, there intersection are empty.
I tried to do to define A (inifity set) as { ∅,{∅},{∅,{∅}}…}, and B is {∅}, but I don't know if it is ok? And if it is not, which example can be suitable?
 
I need to find an example that disprove each statement. A and B are sets. (It can be an infinity set)
1. P(A\B) = P(A) if and only if A and B are disjoint sets
2. If (AUB)\A = (B\A)UA then B ⊂ A. (B is not equal to the empty set)
Does the notation \(\bf{P}(A)\) stand for the powerset of \(A~?\)
 
Yes. P(A) is the powerset of A.
I am trying to find an example that disprove this statement.
 
P(A\B) = P(A) if and only if A and B are disjoint sets
I am looking for an example to disprove it.
I found that:
A = { n | n * n=1, n ∈ Z}
B = {1}

Is it correct? If not, can you please give me an example of sets A and B that disprove the statement.

Thank you.
 
P(A\B) = P(A) if and only if A and B are disjoint sets
That statement is true.
|f \(A\cap B=\emptyset\) then \(A\setminus B = A\) therefore \(\mathscr{P}(A\setminus B)=\mathscr{P}(A)\).
We prove the converse by contradiction.
Suppose that \(\mathscr{P}(A\setminus B)=\mathscr{P}(A)~\&~\exists t\in A\cap B\).
But that means \(\{t\}\in \mathscr{P}(A)\) but \(\{t\}\notin \mathscr{P}(A\setminus B)\).
Thus if \(\mathscr{P}(A\setminus B)=\mathscr{P}(A)\) then \(A\cap B=\emptyset\)
 
2. If (AUB)\A = (B\A)UA then B ⊂ A. (B is not equal to the empty set)
The above is a logically true statement.
That takes a bit of explaining.
The statement If \(2+2=5\) then \((-1)^2<0\) is true. Because a false implies any statement.
The statement \((A\cup B)\setminus A=(B\setminus A)\cup A\) is false.
 
@pka
(AUB)\A = B\A
(B\A)UA = BUA
Now (B\A) = BUA if A = [math]\emptyset[/math]But pka claims (I think) that (AUB)\A = (B\A)UA is never true.
 
@pka
(AUB)\A = B\A
(B\A)UA = BUA
Now (B\A) = BUA if A = [math]\emptyset[/math]But pka claims (I think) that (AUB)\A = (B\A)UA is never true.
Note that the problem states \(B\ne \emptyset\) and if \((A\cup B)\setminus A=(B\setminus A)\cup A\) then \(B\subset A\)
 
Note that the problem states \(B\ne \emptyset\) and if \((A\cup B)\setminus A=(B\setminus A)\cup A\) then \(B\subset A\)
But I never assumed that B = [math]\emptyset[/math]
 
But I never assumed that B = [math]\emptyset[/math]
I understand that you did not but the problem does.
It says that if \((A\cup B)\setminus A=(B\setminus A)\cup A\) then \(B\subset A\) {B not empty.) If A is empty then B is also.
Think about it.
\((A\cup B)\setminus A\\ (A\cup B)\cap A^c\\(A\cap A^c)\cup (B\cap A^c)\\B\setminus A\) AND \((B\setminus A)\cup A\\(B\cap A^c)\cup A\\(B\cup A)\cap (A^c\cup A)\\B\cup A\) It is saying that \(B\setminus A=B\cup A\) implies \(B\subset A\) \(B\ne \emptyset\)
 
I too arrived in my previous post that that the problem is saying that B∖A=B∪A implies B⊂A (and B≠∅).

Now I see it, if A = ∅ and B A, the B= ∅
 
Top