Sequence's limit with Bernoulli's inequality

dormar

New member
Joined
Nov 7, 2010
Messages
2
Hi there. I (and the rest of the class) have been hitting the wall with this one for days. Would love if someone here can help us with this.
The problem's is this:
Prove the following:
\(\displaystyle \lim_{n->\infty}{(2\sqrt[n]x-1)^n}=x^2\)
When x>1
Using the squeeze theorem and Bernoulli's inequality.
Now I've managed to prove x^2 is greater than the expression for large n, but no matter what permutation's of the expression I use Bernoulli's inequality with, I still don't get anything whose limit is x^2. Can anyone help?
Thank you so much.

BTW:
Bernoulli's inequality:
For \(\displaystyle x> -1\):
\(\displaystyle (1+x)^n \ge 1+nx\)
Also, I can't use advanced calculus methods, like l'Hospital's rule and the such, because we haven't studied them, we're just on sequence limits for now, with sequence arithmetic and the such.
Thanks again.
 
Try making a substitution. i.e. let t=1/n

I do not have time now to look at it in depth, but I will take a gander this afternoon.

Try working an LN and/or an e into your limit. Note that \(\displaystyle e^{2ln(x)}=x^{2}\)

If you can get it to this point, you have it made. Note that it looks similar to the famous e limits we learn about this time.

Such as \(\displaystyle \lim_{x\to 0}(1+x)^{\frac{1}{x}}=e\)

or \(\displaystyle \lim_{x\to {\infty}}(1+\frac{1}{x})^{x}=e\)
 
Thanks for the reply!
Unfortunately, we're not supposed to use limits of numbers approaching 0 (as you have suggested, I assume - calling t=1/n and then taking the limit as it approaches 0). It might help, but we're supposed to only use sequences using a natural number (n) approaching infinity.
As for the e^2lnx, I've been trying to get to that expression, without success. Also, I'm pretty sure it can't be done - not with bernoulli anyway, since e^2lnx=x^2 which is the series approaching x^2 that is greater then the mentioned series, and we're looking for the series that's always lesser than the given series.
With many thanks, again...
Dor.
 
Top