Sequence convergence and limit: {(n+1)^a - n^a}, n=1 to infty, 0 < a < 1

MCarsten

New member
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
2
The problem read as follows:


Determine if the sequence \(\displaystyle \left\{(n+1)^{\alpha}-n^{\alpha}\right\}_{n=1}^{+\infty}, 0 < \alpha < 1\)
converges or diverges. If it converges, give its limit value.

The answer is: converges, the limit is zero.

I know that this sequence limit can be evaluated easily with some algebra manipulation getting the corresponding function and applying L'Hopital's rule to it. But I would like to try another way around just for the sake of playing with something less mechanical.


Below is my reasoning. I'd be grateful if someone can point me out if it is correct.


---

First, I've evaluated a few terms looking forward to eventually fathom some pattern. So:

\(\displaystyle a_{1} = 2^{\alpha}-1 \to 2^{\alpha} = a_{1}+1\)


\(\displaystyle a_{2} = 3^{\alpha}-2^{\alpha} = 3^{\alpha} - (a_{1} + 1) \to 3^{\alpha} = a_{2} + a_{1}+1\)


\(\displaystyle a_{3} = 4^{\alpha}-3^{\alpha} = 4^{\alpha} - (a_{2} + a_{1} + 1) \to 4^{\alpha} = a_{3} + a_{2} + a_{1}+1\)


\(\displaystyle a_{4} = 5^{\alpha}-4^{\alpha} = 5^{\alpha} - (a_{3} + a_{2} + a_{1} + 1) \to 5^{\alpha} = a_{4} + a_{3} + a_{2} + a_{1}+1\)


\(\displaystyle \vdots\)


\(\displaystyle a_{n} = (n+1)^{\alpha} - n^{\alpha} = (n+1)^{\alpha} - (a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3} + \ldots\ + a_{3} + a_{2} + a_{1} + 1)\)


As you can see, each new term equals the next index to the alpha-th power subtracted from the sum of all \(\displaystyle n-1\) terms plus one.


Subtracting \(\displaystyle (n+1)^{\alpha}\) from both sides yields:


\(\displaystyle -n^{\alpha} = -(a_{n-1} + \ldots + a_{3} + a_{2} + a_{1} + 1)\)


Let \(\displaystyle m = a_{n-1} + \ldots + a_{3} + a_{2} + a_{1}, m \in ℝ\) be the sum of \(\displaystyle a_{n-1}\) terms. We have:


\(\displaystyle n^{\alpha} = m + 1\)


If we take the roots on both sides we get:


\(\displaystyle n = {(m+1)}^{\frac{1}{\alpha}}\)


It is given by the problem that \(\displaystyle 0 < \alpha < 1\), therefore \(\displaystyle \frac{1}{\alpha} > 1\).


Substitute \(\displaystyle n\) in our \(\displaystyle a_{n}\):


\(\displaystyle a_{n} = (n+1)^{\alpha} - n^{\alpha} = \)


\(\displaystyle = ((m+1)^{\frac{1}{\alpha}}+1)^{\alpha}-((m+1)^{\frac{1}{\alpha}})^{\alpha}\)


Since we are dealing with a limit process, we're interested when \(\displaystyle m\) is a very large number, that is, when \(\displaystyle m \gg 1\). In this particular, the second \(\displaystyle +1\) in the first term above renders no effect. Therefore we can discard him. We will get:


\(\displaystyle ((m+1)^{\frac{1}{\alpha}})^{\alpha}-((m+1)^{\frac{1}{\alpha}})^{\alpha} = 0, m \gg 1\). We can conclude that the limit is \(\displaystyle 0\), that is:


\(\displaystyle \therefore \boxed{\lim_{n\to\infty} (n+1)^{\alpha} - n^{\alpha} = 0}\) and the given sequence converges. \(\displaystyle \blacksquare\)

Is my reasoning correct?
 
Last edited:
the second \(\displaystyle +1\) in the first term above renders no effect. Therefore we can discard him.

First, I dare you to define that process.
Second, wow! That was a lot of work. Excellent exploration. Oddly, though, you rather ended up back where you started.
Third, you may wish to think about the Binomial Theorem.
 
First, I dare you to define that process.
Second, wow! That was a lot of work. Excellent exploration. Oddly, though, you rather ended up back where you started.
Third, you may wish to think about the Binomial Theorem.

Thanks for replying!

As for the first item, I'm considering the fact that \(\displaystyle 0 < \alpha < 1\), which means that the we have the exponent \(\displaystyle \frac{1}{\alpha} > 0\). For very large \(\displaystyle m\), that is, \(\displaystyle m \gg 1\), \(\displaystyle f(x) = (x + 1)^\alpha\) would behave as \(\displaystyle f(x) = x^\alpha\). This can be seen through a plot in the Cartesian plane. What do you think?
 
Not a fan. It may be clear on this one, but it will be increasingly difficult on others. You are still assuming that you are AT the limit. That's no good. One must APPROACH the limit.

You're on a good course. Exploration is good. Keep it up.
 
Top