Rabbit Hole without looking glass

  • Thread starter Deleted member 4993
  • Start date
This article, like most, asserts that Godel proved that "there are some true statements that cannot be proved". I have always disliked that phrasing since it assumes that there is a notion of "true" for mathematical statements independent of proof. I prefer to say that Godel proved that "Given any set of axioms, there exist some statements that can be neither proven nor disproven".
 
This article, like most, asserts that Godel proved that "there are some true statements that cannot be proved". I have always disliked that phrasing since it assumes that there is a notion of "true" for mathematical statements independent of proof. I prefer to say that Godel proved that "Given any set of axioms, there exist some statements that can be neither proven nor disproven".
"I prefer to say that Godel proved that "Given any set of axioms, there exist some statements that can be neither proven nor disproven".

That's the agnostic view and matches mine.
 
Top