trickslapper
Junior Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2010
- Messages
- 62
This is for a real analysis class, i already turned in this problem and i got marked wrong for it and got into a little argument with my professor about it:
The integral sinx/lnx from 2 to infinity. I used the Abel-Dirichlet test that my professor showed us in class:
1. the integral of f(x) must be bounded
2. as x approaches infinity Limit of g must be zero
3. g'(x) must be continous on [a,infinity)
So here is my work:
Let f=sin(x); g=1/ln(x)
1. integral of f(x)=-cos(x) which is indeed bounded
2. the limit as x goes to infinity of g is indeed zero.
3. g'(x)= -1/xln(x)ln(x) which is continuous on [2,infinity)
Ok so from this test i came to the conclusion that the integral of sinx/lnx converges. My professor disagrees:
Here is my professors argument:
Consider lnx<x this implies that 1/lnx>1/x which implies that sin(x)/ln(x)>sin(x)/x
By the p-test we know that sin(x)/x converges and then that means that sin(x)/ln(x) also diverges by comparison test.
I'm not some stuck up student who thinks he's always right, but i'm pretty sure that i'm right but... i also see my professors argument so before i bring it up again i want to make sure that i'm correct.
Can anyone see what might be going wrong here?
thanks!
The integral sinx/lnx from 2 to infinity. I used the Abel-Dirichlet test that my professor showed us in class:
1. the integral of f(x) must be bounded
2. as x approaches infinity Limit of g must be zero
3. g'(x) must be continous on [a,infinity)
So here is my work:
Let f=sin(x); g=1/ln(x)
1. integral of f(x)=-cos(x) which is indeed bounded
2. the limit as x goes to infinity of g is indeed zero.
3. g'(x)= -1/xln(x)ln(x) which is continuous on [2,infinity)
Ok so from this test i came to the conclusion that the integral of sinx/lnx converges. My professor disagrees:
Here is my professors argument:
Consider lnx<x this implies that 1/lnx>1/x which implies that sin(x)/ln(x)>sin(x)/x
By the p-test we know that sin(x)/x converges and then that means that sin(x)/ln(x) also diverges by comparison test.
I'm not some stuck up student who thinks he's always right, but i'm pretty sure that i'm right but... i also see my professors argument so before i bring it up again i want to make sure that i'm correct.
Can anyone see what might be going wrong here?
thanks!