proof

red and white kop!

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2009
Messages
231
two lines have equations y=m(1)x + c(1) and y = m(2)x + c(2), and m(1)m(2) = -1, proove that the lines are perpendicular.
im aware that this is supposed to be an extension question but still i dont know what to use in order to proove this, seeing that m(1)m(2) = -1 is apparently not enough. can somebody help with a clear proof on how to do this?
 
Here's another.

[attachment=0:w5aqia6b]junk4.JPG[/attachment:w5aqia6b]
 

Attachments

  • junk4.JPG
    junk4.JPG
    37.6 KB · Views: 106
And another ;)

Certainly they are not parallel, so they must intersect. WLOG assume m1 > m2.

We obtain the intersection point via:

\(\displaystyle m_1x + c_1 = y = m_2x + c_2 \,\, \implies \,\, x = \frac{c_2-c_1}{m_1-m_2}\)

\(\displaystyle \,\, \implies \,\, y = m_1 \frac{c_2-c_1}{m_1-m_2} +c1 = m_2 \frac{c_2-c_1}{m_1-m_2} +c2\)

This is not necessary, but we should know it exists.

We may form two vectors along the lines like so (x and y exist as the above quantities):

\(\displaystyle P_1 = (x,y) = Q_1, P_2 = (x+1,y+m_1), Q_2 = (x+1,y+m_2)\)

(You can verify the above by pluggin in (x+1) in for x and seeing it comes out to y+slope)

Notice \(\displaystyle \bar{P}\) is a vector lying on the first line, \(\displaystyle \bar{Q}\) on the second. To verify, you may take any point on the vector within the domain (x,x+1) and show it satisfies the linear equation.

\(\displaystyle \bar{P} = <1, m_1>\)
\(\displaystyle \bar{Q} =<1, m_2>\)

Taking the dot product we see:

\(\displaystyle \bar{P} \cdot \bar{Q} = 1 + m_1m_2 = 1 + (-1) = 0\)

Hene vectors \(\displaystyle \bar{P}\) and \(\displaystyle \bar{Q}\) are orthogonal, and so are the lines.
 
Top