I am stumped on this problem: 5. Determine the present worth of the following cash flow at 10% interest. Include at least one gradient. Show calculations.
Years Cash Flow
Y4 : $50
Y5: $100
Y6: $150
Y7: $200
Y8: $100
Y9: $100
Y10: $50
Y11: $50
This is what I have assumed so far: I have to account for the money for all of the yeas and I think this is an annuity gradient problem. It might be a differred annuity because it starts at year 4. I thought that the gradient was 50 but looking at year 7 and 8 it increases by 100.
I started my caluclations like this but I have a feeling I am going in the wrong direction. I used an online calculator which showed that the PW is 409 and this is the answer I have, if that is the correct answer. What does include at least one gradient mean?
I also looked on line and the closest formula that I see is (F/P, 10%, 8) so I am thinking that if that is the gradient for NPW then I should be using this formula.
Any how I went back to using the NPV formula: NPV = CF4/(1+rate)^4 +CF5/(1+rate)^5......CF11/(1+rate)^11
Y4: 50/1.10^4 = 34.150
Y5: 100/1.10^5 = 62.09
Y6: 150/1.10^6 = 84.67
Y7: 200/1.10^7 = 102.63
Y8: 100/1.10^8 = 46.65
Y9: 100/1.10^9 = 42.41
Y10: 50/1.10^10 19.28
Y11: 50/1.10^11 =17.52
NPW= 34.15 + 62.09+ 84.67 +102.63+46.65+42.41+ 19.28 +17.52 = 409.4
NPW = 409.
If this is correct how do I include at least one gradient?
Thanks again for all your help.
Years Cash Flow
Y4 : $50
Y5: $100
Y6: $150
Y7: $200
Y8: $100
Y9: $100
Y10: $50
Y11: $50
This is what I have assumed so far: I have to account for the money for all of the yeas and I think this is an annuity gradient problem. It might be a differred annuity because it starts at year 4. I thought that the gradient was 50 but looking at year 7 and 8 it increases by 100.
I started my caluclations like this but I have a feeling I am going in the wrong direction. I used an online calculator which showed that the PW is 409 and this is the answer I have, if that is the correct answer. What does include at least one gradient mean?
I also looked on line and the closest formula that I see is (F/P, 10%, 8) so I am thinking that if that is the gradient for NPW then I should be using this formula.
Any how I went back to using the NPV formula: NPV = CF4/(1+rate)^4 +CF5/(1+rate)^5......CF11/(1+rate)^11
Y4: 50/1.10^4 = 34.150
Y5: 100/1.10^5 = 62.09
Y6: 150/1.10^6 = 84.67
Y7: 200/1.10^7 = 102.63
Y8: 100/1.10^8 = 46.65
Y9: 100/1.10^9 = 42.41
Y10: 50/1.10^10 19.28
Y11: 50/1.10^11 =17.52
NPW= 34.15 + 62.09+ 84.67 +102.63+46.65+42.41+ 19.28 +17.52 = 409.4
NPW = 409.
If this is correct how do I include at least one gradient?
Thanks again for all your help.