Piecewise Functions

abbeyk791

New member
Joined
Feb 20, 2021
Messages
3
I understand the concept of piecewise functions I just need help as to what this means because I’m so so confused and it’s stressing me out, it is relating to greater than and less than sort of stuff CD7F2BF5-7FEC-4002-8743-7160E516BC0C.jpeg
 
That may just be a typo for \(x\ge2\); if you would show the whole thing, I could say more. You zoomed in a little too far -- context very important in defining symbols.
 
It can be viewed in questions 17,19 and 23. The fact that it’s been used three times is making me think it isn’t a typo
 

Attachments

  • 68DA3310-8A55-490A-AB66-695CD0C5127E.png
    68DA3310-8A55-490A-AB66-695CD0C5127E.png
    522.4 KB · Views: 5
Very odd. It always occurs where I'd expect \(\ge\) -- except in #15, which you didn't mention.

Are there solutions given for any of these, so you could confirm that it has the meaning I expect, namely "any case other than those whose meaning is clear"? I still think it has to be a mistake, unless you can find a definition of the symbol in the book.
 
I was unable to find a definition but in question 15, both f(1) and f(-1) used the bottom equation, and in question 19 neither f(-1) or f(3) used the equation with the symbol, my best bet was it meant either + or - but I could be wrong
 
I was unable to find a definition but in question 15, both f(1) and f(-1) used the bottom equation, and in question 19 neither f(-1) or f(3) used the equation with the symbol, my best bet was it meant either + or - but I could be wrong
Still very odd. In #15, f(1) definitely does not use the bottom expression, and in #19, f(3) can't use the bottom expression. Are you saying that a solution was given that did this? Please show it!
 
Top