Optimization, again: construct a rectangular storage container that has....

whiteti

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2013
Messages
75
I want to construct a rectangular storage container that has a square base, a closed top, and a volume of 9ft3. If the material for the base costs $5/ft2 and the material for the sides and top costs $4/ft2, what is the cost of the cheapest such container?

I'm stuck, how do I set up my equation?
 
I want to construct a rectangular storage container that has a square base, a closed top, and a volume of 9ft3. If the material for the base costs $5/ft2 and the material for the sides and top costs $4/ft2, what is the cost of the cheapest such container?

I'm stuck, how do I set up my equation?

What do you need to "find"?

What are "given" to you?

What are the connections between the "givens" and the "find"?
 
I want to construct a rectangular storage container that has a square base, a closed top, and a volume of 9ft3. If the material for the base costs $5/ft2 and the material for the sides and top costs $4/ft2, what is the cost of the cheapest such container?

I'm stuck, how do I set up my equation?
First step is to assign names for the variables - such as
Let x = side of square base
.....h = height of container

Then make equations for the needed areas - to find the total cost, you will need the area of the base, and also the combined area of the sides and top.

Let us see how far you get.
 
What do you need to "find"?

What are "given" to you?

What are the connections between the "givens" and the "find"?
Im at
V=xy
and

5y+4x+5y+4x = 10y+4x

solving for y is y=2/5x

so substituting back into V=xy
V=x(2/5x) = 2/5 x2

not sure where to go from here, or if this is even correct
 
Im at
V=xy ................................................... What are 'x' and 'y'?
and

5y+4x+5y+4x = 10y+4x

solving for y is y=2/5x

so substituting back into V=xy
V=x(2/5x) = 2/5 x2

not sure where to go from here, or if this is even correct
.
 
x is the base........................................does not make sense - x is what property of base - length of one side? cost? thickness? ... what?

y is the top and sides........................................ similarly does not make sense

V is being minimized? ..................................... what is V - related to box?
.
 
x is the base
y is the top and sides
V is being minimized?

I think you meant, x is the length of the sides of the base (they are both x since the base is a square).

So V = lwh or x*x*y or x²y.

Next, you need the surface area formula using the cost of the materials. What is the surface area formula of your container? And no it's not 10y + 4x.
 
good point, I wasn't really thinking

So i need the area of the base, sides and top separately?
How does the given value for volume come into play here?

I want x to be whatever the base has to be

and y to be relevant the top and sides
 
ok, Ive taken a new approach

Cost of base: 5wl
Cost of front: 4lh
Cost of back: 4lh
Cost of left side: 4wh
Cost of right side: 4wh
Cost of top: 4wl

Cost= 5wl+2(4lh)+2(4wh)+4wl
= 5wl+8lh+8wh+4wl
=9wl+8lh+8wh

now I'm stuck again...
 
ok, Ive taken a new approach

Cost of base: 5wl
Cost of front: 4lh
Cost of back: 4lh
Cost of left side: 4wh
Cost of right side: 4wh
Cost of top: 4wl

Cost= 5wl+2(4lh)+2(4wh)+4wl
= 5wl+8lh+8wh+4wl
=9wl+8lh+8wh

now I'm stuck again...
Since the base is a square, w = l = x (feet). Thus (for instance),
......Cost of base = ($5/ft^2) * x^2
......Cost of 4 sides = ($4/ft^2) * perimeter * h
......Cost of top = . . .

There are two unknowns in the equation for total cost: x and h

How about the volume? You can use the fact that V = 9 ft^3 to find a relationship between x and h. Then you can convert the Cost equation to a single variable, and finally minimize that cost function. CARRY ON!

You may notice that I write units on EVERY number. That is a tool to be sure I do the correct arithmetic: area must be the product of two lengths, and Volume must be cubic feet. Cost has to turn out to be $.
 
Top