Hi there!
I was wondering if anyone could spare 2 minutes for what may be a pretty simple question with regards to u and du substitution for an integration problem.
Assuming we were using U-Sub and not just multiplying out the following function.
f(x) = 2(x)(x2+1)
We would let:
u = (x2+1)
du/dx = 2x therefore du=2x dx
So why when we rewrite the integral in terms of u and du i.e udu do you integrate the u and then sub in the x value and not integrate the du and sub in du?
I know from doing these questions that we add a 'c' (constant) and the du disappears but I don't understand why other than by convention. We have given it a value when we rearrange the du/dx above so shouldn't du be integrated and the 2x be subbed in also? When you integrate du by itself shouldn't we get u+c making the whole thing = u2 /2 * u+ c
This may be really obvious but I can't make sense of it - any help explaining this would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks for your help guys!
M
I was wondering if anyone could spare 2 minutes for what may be a pretty simple question with regards to u and du substitution for an integration problem.
Assuming we were using U-Sub and not just multiplying out the following function.
f(x) = 2(x)(x2+1)
We would let:
u = (x2+1)
du/dx = 2x therefore du=2x dx
So why when we rewrite the integral in terms of u and du i.e udu do you integrate the u and then sub in the x value and not integrate the du and sub in du?
I know from doing these questions that we add a 'c' (constant) and the du disappears but I don't understand why other than by convention. We have given it a value when we rearrange the du/dx above so shouldn't du be integrated and the 2x be subbed in also? When you integrate du by itself shouldn't we get u+c making the whole thing = u2 /2 * u+ c
This may be really obvious but I can't make sense of it - any help explaining this would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks for your help guys!
M