W(1) and W(2) are independent geometric series distributions, where W(1) has parameter p(1), and W(2) has parameter p(2).
I'm trying find P(W(1) < W(2)), and have gotten as far as this...
***(Summation from w=0 to infinity - sorry, not sure how to put summation and other math signs here)Pr(W(1) < w) * Prob(W(2) = w)
We know that Prob(W(2)) = (1 - p(2))^(w-1) * p(2), where w = 1, 2, 3, ..., w
However, where I'm lost is to find Pr(W(1) < w) - is it (1 - p(1))^(w-2) * p(1) ? The reason why put (w-2) in the exponential part is because we're looking for W(1) < w, so I'm assuming that w = 1, 2, 3, ..., w-1, because W(1) < w. Is this part correct?
Now - after everything is all said and done, need to find *** above...how do I do this? My confusion is how to put this all in a geometric series. If W(1) = w, then it would be easier because both have exponents (w-1), however, the (w-2) one makes it a bit more tricker.
Thanks!
I'm trying find P(W(1) < W(2)), and have gotten as far as this...
***(Summation from w=0 to infinity - sorry, not sure how to put summation and other math signs here)Pr(W(1) < w) * Prob(W(2) = w)
We know that Prob(W(2)) = (1 - p(2))^(w-1) * p(2), where w = 1, 2, 3, ..., w
However, where I'm lost is to find Pr(W(1) < w) - is it (1 - p(1))^(w-2) * p(1) ? The reason why put (w-2) in the exponential part is because we're looking for W(1) < w, so I'm assuming that w = 1, 2, 3, ..., w-1, because W(1) < w. Is this part correct?
Now - after everything is all said and done, need to find *** above...how do I do this? My confusion is how to put this all in a geometric series. If W(1) = w, then it would be easier because both have exponents (w-1), however, the (w-2) one makes it a bit more tricker.
Thanks!