Well, I think s has \(\displaystyle 2^m\) divisors, but \(\displaystyle 1.01*s \)?
N would be \(\displaystyle \Pi_{k=1}^{k=m}\,\,\, p_k^2 \) , where \(\displaystyle m>2017 \)?
Sorry, what I should have said is how many divisors does n have, not how many prime divisors. Also, not that p1, p2, p3, ... are the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, ... primes but rather a set of primes such that p1 < p2 < p3 < ...
Now, more ramblings [I'm not sure we are going any where useful]. Let m=0 [i.e. n=1]. The number of divisors is 1=3
0.
[1]
Let m=1 [i.e. n = p
12]. The number of divisors is 3 = 3
1
[1*[1], p
1*[1], p
12*[1]] = [1, p
1, p
12]
Let m=2. The number of divisors is 9=3
2
[1*[1, p
1, p
12], p
2*[1, p
1, p
12], p
22*[1, p
1, p
12]]
= [1, p
1, p
12, p
2, p
1 p
2, p
12 p
2, p
22, p
1 p
22, p
12 p
22]
Let m=3 The number of divisors is 27=3
3
[1*[1, p
1, p
12, p
2, p
1 p
2, p
12 p
2, p
22, p
1 p
22, p
12 p
22], p
3*[1, p
1, p
12, p
2, p
1 p
2, p
12 p
2, p
22, p
1 p
22, p
12 p
22], p
32*[1, p
1, p
12, p
2, p
1 p
2, p
12 p
2, p
22, p
1 p
22, p
12 p
22]]
=[...]
Now generalize that, i.e.
\(\displaystyle s=\sqrt{n} = \Pi_{k=1}^m\, p_k^q\)
The number of divisors of s is
qm. If we let q=p
k, then obviously d is greater than or equal to s. Can we find an m so that p
km< 1.01 s. What about m < log(1.01 s)/log(p
k)
Is that enough to play around with for a while?
BTW: There should be some easier way to do this. Anybody?
EDIT: Sorry, that should have been (q+1)
k I think