I don't understand this problem:
IN [x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+2x+3/x[sup:3d9qnysh]3[/sup:3d9qnysh]3x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+9x dx]
Here's what I've figured out:
u=x[sup:3d9qnysh]3[/sup:3d9qnysh]+3x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+9x
du=3x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+6x+9
=3(x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+2x+3 dx)
dx=1/3 du
=1/3 IN [3(x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+2x+3)/x[sup:3d9qnysh]3[/sup:3d9qnysh]+3x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+9x) dx]
How would you continue on after this point? :?
Also for this problem:
IN [x/x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+1 dx]
What I did:
u=x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+1
du=2xdx
xdx=1/2du
=1/2 IN [1/u du]
=1/2 ln [x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+1]+c
My book says there would not be an absolute value in the answer and I was not sure why.
IN [x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+2x+3/x[sup:3d9qnysh]3[/sup:3d9qnysh]3x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+9x dx]
Here's what I've figured out:
u=x[sup:3d9qnysh]3[/sup:3d9qnysh]+3x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+9x
du=3x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+6x+9
=3(x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+2x+3 dx)
dx=1/3 du
=1/3 IN [3(x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+2x+3)/x[sup:3d9qnysh]3[/sup:3d9qnysh]+3x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+9x) dx]
How would you continue on after this point? :?
Also for this problem:
IN [x/x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+1 dx]
What I did:
u=x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+1
du=2xdx
xdx=1/2du
=1/2 IN [1/u du]
=1/2 ln [x[sup:3d9qnysh]2[/sup:3d9qnysh]+1]+c
My book says there would not be an absolute value in the answer and I was not sure why.