More help needed with rational equations

kathrynk

New member
Joined
Sep 7, 2020
Messages
14
This is the last word problem on my test that I can’t figure out. I have an example from my book with a similar problem but the missing numbers are switched so it doesn’t actually help me to solve it. So far I know that if Isabella takes 7 hours to rake leaves on her own and her brother is 3 times as fast, he takes 2 1/3 hr to rake leaves on his own. So following my book’s example, she rakes leaves at a rate of 1/3t and he rakes leaves at a rate of 1/t. But, I don’t know what to do after this. (You can see some of my notes trying to figure this out on the answer sheet for my practice questions but I have way more elsewhere and still was confused)
 

Attachments

  • 1A6418EA-4444-41A6-BF46-367FDB14BB75.jpeg
    1A6418EA-4444-41A6-BF46-367FDB14BB75.jpeg
    2.5 MB · Views: 6
  • 9DF1F8B6-862B-408A-A4F5-0D3A3D21B2A4.jpeg
    9DF1F8B6-862B-408A-A4F5-0D3A3D21B2A4.jpeg
    3 MB · Views: 6
  • 1D3D6497-AC96-4D1F-A55B-1A007FD2819F.jpeg
    1D3D6497-AC96-4D1F-A55B-1A007FD2819F.jpeg
    3.3 MB · Views: 5
The example you show is a harder type of problem, in which the unknown is the time it takes a person to do a job alone.

In your problem, you know the rates alone; Isabella does 1/7 of the job per hour, and Matthew's rate is 3 times that. No variable is needed there. The unknown is how long it takes together. (Commonly you would have been given an example like this first, before the example you showed.)

The unknown goes in the middle column, the time taken when they work together.
 
This is the last word problem on my test that I can’t figure out. I have an example from my book with a similar problem but the missing numbers are switched so it doesn’t actually help me to solve it. So far I know that if Isabella takes 7 hours to rake leaves on her own and her brother is 3 times as fast, he takes 2 1/3 hr to rake leaves on his own. So following my book’s example, she rakes leaves at a rate of 1/3t and he rakes leaves at a rate of 1/t. But, I don’t know what to do after this. (You can see some of my notes trying to figure this out on the answer sheet for my practice questions but I have way more elsewhere and still was confused)
"she rakes leaves at a rate of 1/3t and he rakes leaves at a rate of 1/t" doesn't make sense because you haven't said what "t" represents. If Isabella takes 7 hours to rake leaves (from 1 lawn, say) she rakes leaves at a rate of 1/7 lawn per hour. If her brother, working three times as fast, rakes a yard in 7/3 hours then he rakes 3/7 yard per hour. Working together their rates add so they work at 1/7+ 3/7= 4/7 yard per hour and so take 7/4= 1.75 hours to rake the lawn.
 
The secret, in my opinion, is to realize that you want 1 job done. So you want the part of the job Isabella does plus the part of the job that her brother does to equal 1!
 
The secret, in my opinion, is to realize that you want 1 job done. So you want the part of the job Isabella does plus the part of the job that her brother does to equal 1!
Yes I understood that from the example given in my book. So I want to add up to 7/7. From Hall of Ivy’s post I realize they work at a rate of 4/7 an hour but I’m confused how inverting to 7/4 helps. Or how to figure out how much of an hour 3/7 of the yard takes. Or how much each of them does individually for the third column
 
"she rakes leaves at a rate of 1/3t and he rakes leaves at a rate of 1/t" doesn't make sense because you haven't said what "t" represents. If Isabella takes 7 hours to rake leaves (from 1 lawn, say) she rakes leaves at a rate of 1/7 lawn per hour. If her brother, working three times as fast, rakes a yard in 7/3 hours then he rakes 3/7 yard per hour. Working together their rates add so they work at 1/7+ 3/7= 4/7 yard per hour and so take 7/4= 1.75 hours to rake the lawn.
I’m sorry I wrote it like that. That was me going by the example from the text book and making things more complicated for myself adding in t (Time to complete the task on their own) when I already know what it is. But I still don’t totally understand the end of your answer? Why would I invert 7/4 to get the total time?
 
The goal is to find "hours per lawn" -- how long it takes. That is the reciprocal of "lawns per hour" -- how fast you work.

This kind of problem is all about this reciprocal relationship. In fact, that's why these problems are taught as part of studying rational equations!
 
You do 4/7 of the job in 1 hour, so you do (4/7)*t of the job in t hours. So you want to solve (4/7)t = 1 for t and that t will will be?
 
You do 4/7 of the job in 1 hour, so you do (4/7)*t of the job in t hours. So you want to solve (4/7)t = 1 for t and that t will will be?
Okay doing it reciprocally(?) does in fact translate to 7/4 like hall of ivy said or 1 3/4 hours. And now I have to find what they each contributed to that time and I think I can figure that out since that is shown in the answer key for the example. I jsut have to use the LCD bc it won’t translate from sevenths to fourths otherwise
 
You know that Isabella does 1/7 of the job each hour. Now you know how many hours she works for and should be able to find out what part of the job she does.
 
Okay turns out I didn’t have to use LCD and was making things harder than I needed to according to my calculator app. But I think I’m done. And now I’m done with this chapter of algebra!
 

Attachments

  • 1156D3E5-1C00-4399-B8F9-91D2E2C8736E.jpeg
    1156D3E5-1C00-4399-B8F9-91D2E2C8736E.jpeg
    3 MB · Views: 4
Does it make sense to you that Isabella does only 1/4 of the job while her brother does 3/4 of the job?
 
Does it make sense to you that Isabella does only 1/4 of the job while her brother does 3/4 of the job?
Yes? He works 3 times as fast as she does. So even tho the denominator/time frame is different, if out of 1 3/4 hours she works 1/4, 1/4 x 3 is 3/4s so it adds up to a whole while considering their individual rates.
 
Top