topsquark
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2012
- Messages
- 2,307
I was just reading an old Topology text and it is interesting how the method of presentation is rather different from the more modern texts.
I ran into an interesting comment on the definition of the ordinal numbers. It used \(\displaystyle \Omega\) to define the ordinals and goes on to define the cardinals in a similar fashion. I must say I rather liked that presentation better then in my other texts.
This brings up a question that I've had for a while and I've managed to ask it on every new site I've gotten on. You all have some advanced members and questions so perhaps I should ask here, too: Is there an explicit representation of \(\displaystyle \Omega\)? I've never found one and it drives me a bit crazy because I think I should be able to construct it, since the concept of it is fairly straightforward. But I can't.
Thanks!
-Dan
I ran into an interesting comment on the definition of the ordinal numbers. It used \(\displaystyle \Omega\) to define the ordinals and goes on to define the cardinals in a similar fashion. I must say I rather liked that presentation better then in my other texts.
This brings up a question that I've had for a while and I've managed to ask it on every new site I've gotten on. You all have some advanced members and questions so perhaps I should ask here, too: Is there an explicit representation of \(\displaystyle \Omega\)? I've never found one and it drives me a bit crazy because I think I should be able to construct it, since the concept of it is fairly straightforward. But I can't.
Thanks!
-Dan