rachelmaddie
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2019
- Messages
- 851
I did put that but I deleted it because I wasn’t sure if it was correct.That's very clean and organized.
I might have wanted just one more thing:
Before writing [math]9 + 3x + 6 = 36[/math], the algebra version of the problem, it might be good to write the geometry version of the problem, since it was presented as a geometry problem, maybe [math]\overline{CD} + \overline{DE} = \overline{CE}[/math].
You know what that is? Being awesome!I did put that but I deleted it because I wasn’t sure if it was correct.
How do I provide a geometric explanation for that?You know what that is? Being awesome!
Substitute the value of xIt is sufficient as I have written it. Just show that the line segments add up.
So where in the process would I include that?Well, after you write the algebra equation, we don't necessarily need to make any more geometry statements. The geometry led to the algebra. The algebra led to the final result, [math]x = 7[/math]. Checking your answer is not part of the solution. It should be part of your process.
only because you said to show that the line segments add up.There is nothing lacking in your presentation. What do you think you are missing?