It's possible that this is a typo. Writing it out as text you would have lim x -> a f(x) = f(a).O.K. thank you.
someone else?
Or is it just only have a reason in the painter (of the picture) mind?
It looks to me like a non-mathematician's attempt to mimic math. I wouldn't take it as a reliable reference for notation, any more than I'd take your writing as a reliable source for English grammar (or mine for Hebrew).View attachment 17264
1. What is the expression with lim say in the picture? What is the expression suppose to be?
2. How can I formulate a mathematical question with that notation? (for instance)
Agreed. My first reaction was that the \(\large{5x}\) is totally out of place.It's possible that this is a typo. Writing it out as text you would have lim x -> a f(x) = f(a).
It could be, but it never mentions 3 at all. That's why I'm expecting that when we are told the source, it will not turn out to be showing any particular problem, but just an illustration that says, "look at all this random math shooting across!" I could be wrong, of course.It looks to me that it is saying that if \(f(x)=x^2-1\) then \(\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 3} f(x) = 8\)
and that \(\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to a} f(x) = f(a) \)
I used the limit to make a connection between x^2-1 and 8It could be, but it never mentions 3 at all. That's why I'm expecting that when we are told the source, it will not turn out to be showing any particular problem, but just an illustration that says, "look at all this random math shooting across!" I could be wrong, of course.
And, of course, the question was about the notation, which we all agree is wrong in using ">" instead of an arrow.