GIVEN PROBLEM:
Let ?: G --> H be an isomorphism between groups G and H and let S be a subgroup of G. Prove that ?(S) is a subgroup of H.
notation: ?(S) = {h?H: ?(x)=h for some x?G}
My Solution:
So by the subgroup thrm., we need to show that ?(S) has an identity, inverses, and closure.
1. First we need to show that the identity of H is in ?(S)
Let h = e[sub:39rgzyih]h[/sub:39rgzyih] for all h?H
Then ?(e[sub:39rgzyih]g[/sub:39rgzyih]) = e[sub:39rgzyih]h[/sub:39rgzyih]
So the identity of H is in ?(S) .
2. Next we need to show that if a??(S), then a[sup:39rgzyih]-1[/sup:39rgzyih]??(S)
No clue how to prove this, help?
3. Lastly, we must show that if a,b??(S), then ab??(S)
I could show you my original work, but it is really bad, and my teacher marked all this as wrong. :/
I got a bad grade in this proof, and I have en exam coming up, so I want to be able to understand isomorphism proofs better! So if anyone could help me out with this proof, I'd appreciate it. It's a lot easier proving subgroups, but proving isomorphisms as a subgroup is a pain!
THANKS
Let ?: G --> H be an isomorphism between groups G and H and let S be a subgroup of G. Prove that ?(S) is a subgroup of H.
notation: ?(S) = {h?H: ?(x)=h for some x?G}
My Solution:
So by the subgroup thrm., we need to show that ?(S) has an identity, inverses, and closure.
1. First we need to show that the identity of H is in ?(S)
Let h = e[sub:39rgzyih]h[/sub:39rgzyih] for all h?H
Then ?(e[sub:39rgzyih]g[/sub:39rgzyih]) = e[sub:39rgzyih]h[/sub:39rgzyih]
So the identity of H is in ?(S) .
2. Next we need to show that if a??(S), then a[sup:39rgzyih]-1[/sup:39rgzyih]??(S)
No clue how to prove this, help?
3. Lastly, we must show that if a,b??(S), then ab??(S)
I could show you my original work, but it is really bad, and my teacher marked all this as wrong. :/
I got a bad grade in this proof, and I have en exam coming up, so I want to be able to understand isomorphism proofs better! So if anyone could help me out with this proof, I'd appreciate it. It's a lot easier proving subgroups, but proving isomorphisms as a subgroup is a pain!
THANKS