Hi. In math, the verb 'evaluate' means to find a numerical value. You may be thinking about finding an antiderivative, instead. If so, then the answer is 'no', not in terms of variables p(x) and q(x). <edited>is there a rule to evaluate this integral in a closed form … in terms of p(x) and q(x)?
you said no but the site u linked to provides an antiderivative for it <_<Hi. In math, the verb 'evaluate' means to find a numerical value. You may be thinking about finding an antiderivative, instead. If so, then the answer is 'no'.
We would first need to express functions p and q as polynomials. One way to do that is by partial fraction decomposition, as shown in the following thread.
[imath]\;[/imath]Is there a general formula for the antiderivative of rational functions?
Some antiderivatives of rational functions involve inverse trigonometric functions, and some involve logarithms. But inverse trig functions can be expressed in terms of complex logarithms. So is th...math.stackexchange.com
I meant that there's no formula using variable symbols p(x) and q(x), as you'd requested. Please excuse.you said no
I meant that there's no formula using variable symbols p(x) and q(x), as you'd requested. Please excuse.
Do you understand what they've done at that link?
[imath]\;[/imath]
yes i forgot that conditionIf deg(p(x)) > deg(q(x)) you should 1st do long division. That is you really should be asking if there is a formula for the integral you described if deg(p(x)) < deg(q(x))