YeahLooks good!
One thing: Want to show P(n+1) holds, right?
IF p(n) holds for ALL n>1, then why show that p(n+1) is true? Instead, say that p(k) holds for some n=k. Then show that p(k+1) is trueHi I would really appreciate if someone could tell me if my induction step is correct here... thanks
Do you understand the logic of a proof by induction?Hi I would really appreciate if someone could tell me if my induction step is correct here... thanks
At the end you have \(\displaystyle (1+ a)^{n+1}\ge 1+ a+ na+ na^2\ge 1+ a+ na\) and then argue that since a>-1, 1+ a> 0. But you want it greater than 1, not just greater than 0. Instead, write it as \(\displaystyle (1+ a)^{n+1}\ge 1+ na+ (a+ na^2)\) and show that \(\displaystyle a+ na^2\) is greater than 0.
But you're trying to show that p(n+1) holds, correct?IF p(n) holds for ALL n>1, then why show that p(n+1) is true? Instead, say that p(k) holds for some n=k. Then show that p(k+1) is true
Of course you want to show that p(n+1) is true, but let's replace n with k. So you want to show that p(k+1) is true IF you assume that p(k) is true. The OP assumed that p(k) is true for all k.But you're trying to show that p(n+1) holds, correct?
I hate to be the one asking the obvious, but why not p(n+1)?
Ohhhhhh! I get it. So since p(k) was assumed, we will use p(k+1).Of course you want to show that p(n+1) is true, but let's replace n with k. So you want to show that p(k+1) is true IF you assume that p(k) is true. The OP assumed that p(k) is true for all k.
Your's is good point. However, that actually does not come into the proof.How can \(\displaystyle \ a + na^2 \ \) be shown to necessarily be greater than 0 if a = 0 is a
possibility with a > -1?