Irrational non-argument by Ishuda

lookagain

Elite Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2010
Messages
3,230
The following is a private message sent to me:
Ishuda said:
to the jackass
lookagain said:
The pertinent relationship is not between the sides of the right triangle and the hypotenuse. It's the pertinent relationship between the two legs of the right triangle and the hypotenuse.All right triangles, as well as all triangles, have three sides.
Yes, master. So sorry, master. I'm sure you have your head stuffed up your asparagus and can't see what what going on. If you can't say something constructive why don't you keep your mouth shut.​
I'm not surprised that Ishuda breaks down to this infantile, sarcastic over-the-top aggression.He hasn't grown out of it since like encounters before with me. Instead of a humble "Thank you, you're correct, lookagain," I got the above in the quote.I will just now intensify my efforts and use even more scrutiny as I check his further posts.
 
Originally Posted by lookagain The pertinent relationship is not between the sides of the right triangle and the hypotenuse. It's the pertinent relationship between the two legs of the right triangle and the hypotenuse. All right triangles, as well as all triangles, have three sides.

Lookagain - may I remind you of the relationship between three sides (a, b & c) of any planar triangle - as expressed by law of cosine, which is:

c2 = a2 + b2 - 2*a*b*cos(C) ..... where 'C' is the angle between 'a' & 'b'.

That is the more general pertinent equation.

Two legs of a right-triangle can be called sides.

I cannot find the specific post about "legs" and/or "sides" but I think your "nit-picking" in this case is not valid.
 
Ref: http://www.freemathhelp.com/forum/threads/90832-Set-theory-question

... a union does need a universal set.

A = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7}
B = {0,2,4,8,9,10}

A U B = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}


I don't need to know what universal set that A and B belong to, in
order to write their union set (as above).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7} & B = {0,2,4,8,9,10}
A U B = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}
I don't need to know what universal set that A and B belong to, in
order to write their union set (as above).
One does if one were asked for \(\displaystyle \neg A \cup B\).
You really should respect the limits of your grasp.
 
A = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7}
B = {0,2,4,8,9,10}

A U B = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}


I don't need to know what universal set that A and B belong to, in
order to write their union set (as above).

I am sure you understand that pka was talking about union with a -A(not A) set. Now you are trying to deflect the issue.
 
A = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7}
B = {0,2,4,8,9,10}

A U B = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}


I don't need to know what universal set that A and B belong to, in
order to write their union set (as above).

What were those adjectives you attributed to Ishuda? Ignorant, Irrational, Incompetent ... note all those start with "I"!

Were you standing in front of a mirror when you thought of those? Add one more to describe yourself - intolerant....

Another one ... inconsiderate .....
 
DISCLAIMER: Beer soaked rambling/opinion/observation/reckoning ahead. Read at your own risk. Not to be taken seriously. In no event shall the wandering math knight-errant Sir jonah in his inebriated state be liable to anyone for special, collateral, incidental, or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of the use of his beer (and tequila) powered views.
to the jackass
The pertinent relationship is not between the sides of the right triangle and the hypotenuse. It's the pertinent relationship between the two legs of the right triangle and the hypotenuse.All right triangles, as well as all triangles, have three sides.
Yes, master. So sorry, master. I'm sure you have your head stuffed up your asparagus and can't see what what going on. If you can't say something constructive why don't you keep your mouth shut.
The following is a private message sent to me:I'm not surprised that Ishuda breaks down to this infantile, sarcastic over-the-top aggression.He hasn't grown out of it since like encounters before with me. Instead of a humble "Thank you, you're correct, lookagain," I got the above in the quote.I will just now intensify my efforts and use even more scrutiny as I check his further posts.
Management thanks you profusely for your kind comments, Sir lookagain the scrutinizer. Rest assured that such will be duly noted in your Personnel (yes, 2 n) File, and seriously taken in
consideration at your forthcoming Annual Performance Review (not to be confused with the APR associated with financial jargon).
Management also thanks you profusely for your long years of underappreciated sharp eyed scrutinizing efforts. Management is perpetually amazed at the strict quality control of your efforts. Management can only wonder that, with your obvious talents, you felt content staying with us and didn't set your sights to other greener pastures like
http://mathhelpforum.com
http://mymathforum.com
http://www.sosmath.com/CBB/
http://www.mathisfunforum.com
http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/community
http://forums.xkcd.com/viewforum.php?f=17
Management is almost certain that you will meet someone out there who is just as talented as (or maybe even more talented than) you are.
In addition, management humbly begs your forgiveness for Sir Ishuda's "infantile, sarcastic over-the-top aggression".
Management hereby gives notice to all concerned math knight-errants that they should acknowledge your future correcting posts with a humble "Thank you, you're correct, Sir lookagain".
Finally, for your future corrections, to minimize being corrected yourself by the grammar police, management wishes to bring to your attention your recent omissions of space(s) in between your statements, that is the lack of space between your periods and colons. To help with this minor flaw, management recommends a bottle of tequila to keep you focused.

Cheers.
 
Top